مارشال، استفن (1395). شهرها، طراحی و تکامل (مترجم: سید حسین بحرینی و آمنه بختیار). تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
- معاونت شهرسازی و معماری (1397). تدوین برنامه سوم توسعه شهر تهران. معاونت شهرسازی و معماری شهرداری تهران. کمیته فضایی-کالبدی. ارائه شده در جلسه کمیته شهرسازی شورای اسلامی شهر تهران مورخ 5/8/1397.
- وزارت راه و شهرسازی (1396). طرح پیشگام مسکن. وزارت راه و شهرسازی، تهیه شده توسط گروه توسعه ایرانیان.
- وبگاه دانشنامه آکسفورد https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/institution
- وبگاه دفتر هیئت دولت
http://cabinetoffice.ir/fa/news/3491/بازآفرینی-شهری-رویکردی-نو-در-نوسازی-بافت-های-فرسوده-شهری
- وبگاه شرکت بازآفرینی شهری http://udrc.ir/
- Albrecht, J. (1986). Development, context, and purpose of planning (Urbanism). School of Architecture, University of Illinois.
- Allmendinger, P. (2002). Towards a Post-Positivist Typology of Planning Theory. Planning Theory, 1(1), 77-99.
- Archer, M. S. (2015). Generative Mechanisms Transforming the Social Order. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
- Barker, C. (2005). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage.
- Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Relaity. England: Penguin Books Ltd. Registered Offices: Harmondsworth. Middlesex.
- Blair, T. L. (1973). Recent epirical work on the determinants of relative house prices. Urban Studies, 10(2), 213-233
- Bolan, R. S. (1967). Emerging Views of Planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 33(4), 233-245.
- Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405.
- Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional Economics. American Economic Review, 21(3), 648–657.
- Davidoff, P., & Reiner, T. A. (1962). A Choice Theory of Planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners,28(2), 103-115.
- Etzioni, A. (1969). Toward a Theory of Societal Guidance. The American journal of Sociology, 73(2), 173-187.
- Evans, A. W. (2004). Economics & Land Use Planning, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Faludi, A., & Altes, W. K. (1997). Evaluating communicative planning, in Evaluating Theory-Practice and Urban-Rural Interplay in Planning. Borri D., Khakee A., & Lacirignola C. (ed.s), Selected papers presented at a workshop on Evaluation and Planning held at Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Mediterraneennes (CIHEAM) in Valenzano (Bari) in November 1993, Springer-Science+Business Media, Bv.
- Faragó, L. (2004). The General Theory of Public (Spatial) Planning. Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Series editor: Zoltán Gál.
- Friedmann, J. (1969). Notes on societal action. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 311-318.
- Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
- Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Gunder, M. (2011). Commentary: Is Urban Design Still Urban Planning? An Exploration and Response. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 184.
- Hall, P. (1982). Urban and Regional Planning, 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
- Hall, P.A., & Taylor, R.C.R. (1998). The potential of Historical Institutionalism: A response to Hay and Wincott. Political Studies, XLVI, 958-962.
- Harding, A. (1997). Urban Regimes in a Europe of the Cities? European Urban and Regional Studies, 4, 291-314.
- Harris, B. (1988). The Emerging Unity of Science and Humanism in Planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(4), 521-524.
- Hayek, F.A. (1978). Liberalism, in: New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 119-151.
- Healey, P. (1993). The communicative work of development plans. Environment and Planning, 20, 83-104.
- Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What Are Institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1-25.
- Hodgson, G. M. (1998). The Approach of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 166-192.
- Hopkins, L. D. (2001). Urban development: the logic of making plans. Washington: Island Press.
- Inam, A. (2002). Institutional Analysis and Urban Planning: Means or Ends? The University of Michigan.
- Mannheim, K. (1940). Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction. New York: Harcourt.
- Moore, T. (1978). Why Allow Planners to Do What They Do? A Justification from Economic Theory. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 44(4), 387-398.
- North, D. (1986). Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. Paper prepared for the Conference on the Role of Institutions in Economic Development. Ithaca: Cornell University
- Olson, M. (2002). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Revised of 1971 edi. Harvard University Press.
- Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science, 4(2), 155-169.
- Popper, K. R. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge und Kegan Paul.
- Rydin, Y. (2011). The Purpose of Planning: Creating Sustainable Towns and Cities. Bristol: The Policy Press.
- Savini, F., & Salet, W. (2017). Planning projects in transition, Federico Savini and Willem Salet (Eds.). Berlin: JOVIS Verlag GmbH.
- Savini, F., Majoor, S., & Slaet, W. (2017). Dilemmas of planning: Intervention, Regulation and Investment in planning projects in transition. Federico Savini / Willem Salet (Eds.). JOVIS Verlag GmbH, Berlin. 6-27.
- Shone, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action, United State of America: Basic Book.
- Throgmorton, J. A. (1993). Planning as a Rhetorical Activity- Survey Research as a Trope in Argument. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(3), 334-346.
- Verma, N. (Ed.). (2007). Institutions and Planning: Current Research in Urban and Regional Studies. New York, NY: Elsevier
)