سلطانی، سید علیاصغر (1400). قدرت، زبان و گفتمان؛ سازوکارهای جریان قدرت در جمهوری اسلامی ایران. تهران: نشر نی.
Aqababaee, E., & Razaghi, M. (2022). Islamic Fundamentalism and Gender: The Portrayal of Women in Iranian Movies. Critical Research on Religion, 10(3), 249-266.
Aranda, A. M., Sele, K., Etchanchu, H., Guyt, J. Y., & Vaara, E. (2021). From big data to rich theory: Integrating critical discourse analysis with structural topic modeling. European Management Review, 18(3), 197-214.
Bakumov, P. (2022). An Alternative Model for the Operationalization of Discourse Theory of Laclau and Mouffe. Laboratorium. Журнал социальных исследований, 14(3), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2022-14-3-119-134.
Bacchi, C., & Bonham, J. (2014). Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications. Foucault Studies, 17, 179-192.
Bassett, K. (2014). Rancière, politics, and the Occupy movement. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(5), 886-901.
Bond, S. (2011). Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’: Moving beyond the agonistic-communicative divide. Planning Theory, 10(2), 161–186.
Brinkmann, F. (2019). Topical discourse structures: using topic modeling in discourse analysis approaches. Human IT: Journal for Information Technology Studies as a Human Science, 14(3), 83-114.
Damiens, F. L., Porter, L., & Gordon, A. (2021). The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales. Nature Sustainability, 4(2), 170-179.
Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The Just City. Cornell University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=WzoBfAEACAAJ.
Fischler, R. (1995). Planning Theory as Culture and Experience. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9501400305.
Gunder, M. (2010). Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space. Planning Theory, 9(4), 298-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210368878.
Gunder, M. (2005). Lacan, planning and urban policy formation. Urban Policy and Research, 23(1), 87-107.
Gunder, M., & Hillier, J. (2016). Planning in ten words or less: A Lacanian entanglement with spatial planning. Routledge.
Hillier, J., & Gunder, M. (2005). Not over your dead bodies! A Lacanian interpretation of urban planning discourse and practice. Environment and Planning A, 37(6), 1049-1066.
Griggs, S., Hall, S., Howarth, D., & Seigneuret, N. (2017). Characterizing and evaluating rival discourses of the ‘sustainable city’: Towards a politics of pragmatic adversarialism. Political Geography, 59, 36-46.
Healey, P. (2003). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101-123.
Healey, P., & Healey, P. (1997). Traditions of planning thought. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, 7-30.
Hillier, J. (2003). Agonizing over consensus: Why habermasian ideals cannot beReal. Planning Theory, 2(1), 37-59.
Hillier, J. (2007). Stretching beyond the horizon. Ashgate.
Hofstad, H., Tveit, M. S., & Stokke, K. B. (2015). Between development and protection: Different discourses in urban planning. Landscape Research, 40(3), 279-293.
Howarth, D. R., Norval, A. J., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester University Press.
Huxley, M., & Yiftachel, O. (2000). New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 333-342.
Inch, A., & Shepherd, E. (2020). Thinking conjuncturally about ideology, housing and English planning. Planning Theory, 19(1), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219887771.
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2015). A turning point for planning theory? Overcoming dividing discourses. Planning Theory, 14(2), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213519356.
Jabareen, Y., & Eizenberg, E. (2021). Theorizing urban social spaces and their interrelations: New perspectives on urban sociology, politics, and planning. Planning Theory, 20(3), 211-230.
Jacobs, T. (2018). The dislocated universe of Laclau and Mouffe: an introduction to post-structuralist discourse theory. Critical Review, 30(3-4), 294-315.
Jacobs, T., & Tschötschel, R. (2019). Topic models meet discourse analysis: a quantitative tool for a qualitative approach. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(5), 469-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1576317.
Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871.
Kühn, M. (2021). Agonistic planning theory revisited: The planner’s role in dealing with conflict. Planning Theory, 20(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220953201.
Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (Vol. 8). Verso Books.
Lester, J. N., Lochmiller, C. R., & Gabriel, R. (2017). Exploring the intersection of education policy and discourse analysis: An introduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 25. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2971.
Legacy, C., March, A., & Mouat, C. M. (2014). Limits and potentials to deliberative engagement in highly regulated planning systems: Norm development within fixed rules. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), 26-40.
Lundqvist, L. J. (2004). ‹Greening the people›s home›: The formative power of sustainable development discourse in Swedish housing. Urban Studies, 41(7), 1283-1301.
MacCallum, D. (2008). Participatory planning and means-ends rationality: A translation problem. Planning Theory & Practice, 9(3), 325-343.
McAuliffe, C., & Rogers, D. (2019). The politics of value in urban development: Valuing conflict in agonistic pluralism. Planning Theory, 18(3), 300-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219831381.
Molina-Azorin, J. F., Bergh, D. D., Corley, K. G., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2017). Mixed methods in the organizational sciences: Taking stock and moving forward. In (Vol. 20, 179-192). Sage Publications.
Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research: An International Quarterly, 66 (3), 745-758.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso Books.
Mouffe, C. (2014). By way of a postscript. Parallax, 20(2), 149-157.
Olssen, M. (2021). Discourse, complexity, normativity: Tracing the elaboration of Foucault’s materialist concept of discourse. In A Normative Foucauldian (29-63). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004464452_002
Onursal, R., & Kirkpatrick, D. (2021). Is extremism the ‘new’terrorism? The convergence of ‘extremism’and ‘terrorism’in British parliamentary discourse. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(5), 1094-1116.
Pløger, J. (2004). Strife: Urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095204042318.
Pløger, J. (2018). Conflict and agonism. In M. Gunder, Madanipour, A., & Watson, (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of planning theory (264-275). Routledge.
Pløger, J. (2021). Conflict, consent, dissensus: The unfinished as challenge to politics and planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(6), 1294-1309.
Pløger, J. (2023). Contingency, decision, unfinished planning: let’s quarrel more! European Planning Studies, 31(8), 1634-1650.
Rear, D., & Jones, A. (2013). Discursive struggle and contested signifiers in the arenas of education policy and work skills in Japan. Critical Policy Studies, 7(4), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.843469.
Richardson, T., & Jensen, O. B. (2003). Linking discourse and space: Towards a cultural sociology of space in analysing spatial policy discourses. Urban Studies, 40(1), 7-22.
Sager, T. (2018). Communicative planning. The Routledge handbook of planning theory, 93-104.
Shepherd, E., Inch, A., & Marshall, T. (2020). Narratives of power: Bringing ideology to the fore of planning analysis. Planning Theory, 19(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219898865.
Spicer, A., & Fleming, P. (2007). Intervening in the inevitable: Contesting globalization in a public sector organization. Organization, 14(4), 517-541.
Stengel, F. A., & Nabers, D. (2019). Symposium: The contribution of Laclau’s discourse theory to international relations and international political economy introduction. In (Vol. 41, 248-262). Taylor & Francis.
Törnberg, A., & Törnberg, P. (2016). Combining CDA and topic modeling: Analyzing discursive connections between Islamophobia and anti-feminism on an online forum. Discourse & Society, 27(4), 401-422.
Van Bommel, K., & Spicer, A. (2011). Hail the snail: Hegemonic struggles in the slow food movement. Organization studies, 32(12), 1717-1744.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Structures of news in the press. Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication, 10, 69.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2(1), 62-86.
Van Leeuwen, B. (2015). Absorbing the agony of agonism? The limits of cultural questioning and alternative variations of intercultural civility. Urban Studies, 52(4), 793-808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014528548.
Walton, S., & Boon, B. (2014). Engaging with a Laclau & Mouffe informed discourse analysis: A proposed framework. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 9(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-10-2012-1106
Zanotto, J. M. (2020). The role of discourses in enacting neoliberal urbanism: Understanding the relationship between ideology and discourse in planning. Planning Theory, 19(1), 104-126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219898876.
Zukin, S., Baskerville, R., Greenberg, M., Guthreau, C., Halley, J., Halling, M., Lawler, K., Nerio, R., Stack, R., Vitale, A., & Wissinger, B. (1998). From Coney Island to Las Vegas in the Urban Imaginary:Discursive Practices of Growth and Decline.
Urban Affairs Review,
33(5), 627-654.
https://doi.org/10.1177/107808749803300502.
)