Analysis of the Relationship between Types of Urban Form and Social Sustainability in Neighborhoods of Tehran Case Study: Chizar, Shahrak Gharb, Narmak and Imamzadeh Yahya Neighborhoods

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor, School of Urban Studies, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 M.A. in Urban Planning, School of Urban Studies, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Cities have found a special status in sustainability practices, to the extent that urban sustainability has become one of the main issues in today's world. Meanwhile, from the social viewpoint, the concept of sustainability is always considered as a neglected field, and as a result, urban researchers are less concerned with its relation to planning issues (such as urban form). Meanwhile, studies show that the main roots of social crises lie in the neighborhoods of large cities and their situation. Whereas, social sustainability has become a significant objective of urban planning practice, and has a presence in the various stages of the development process of urban neighborhoods. This research aims to develop a method for measuring social sustainability in relation to urban form as one of the main tools of urban planning intervention. First, typology of the neighborhood form and measurement methods of social sustainability in relation to each form has been derived from theoretical literature. Based on studies conducted in the first stage, the urban form of the neighborhood is divided into four types: shifting planned, shifting organic, stable planned, and stable organic forms. According to the characteristics of each of the four types of urban form, a series of neighborhoods in Tehran city was selected as a case study and then a questionnaire was distributed among its inhabitants to measure social sustainability, i.e. Shahrak Gharb neighborhood has been selected as a stable planned form, Narmak neighborhood as a shifting planned form, Imamzadeh Yahya as a stable organic form, and Chizar as a shifting organic form. Moreover, in order to measure social sustainability, the concept is divided into two dimensions of "social justice/social inclusion" and "social capital/social cohesion", and it was calculated using the following ten main indicators: place attachment, social mix/cultural unity, social interactions, security/trust, demographic stability/change, basic needs (housing, water, sewage, education and viability), wage distribution, access to local opportunities and facilities, health and safety, and decision making/participation. Using Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), it has been determined that the level of social sustainability of the shifting planned neighborhood is the highest one among those case studies. It should be noted that Pearson correlation test was performed to measure the dimensional reliability of factors, which consists of less than three indicators, and its correlation with the value of 0.5 can be considered as "strong". The characteristics of the urban form of each neighborhood in four factors of density, land use, type of urban block and open spaces network, have been investigated using analytical tools such as Space syntax and ArcGIS. Finally, it has been analyzed how each of urban form factors affected these differences. According to the analyses, it can be said that in the planned neighborhoods, if the initial density and compactness will be low, the amount of change can increase the density over time to a level that ensures social sustainability. Of course, each factor of urban form has a threshold limit. That is, passing from a certain limit can reverse the relationship to social sustainability and be a disturbance factor for it.

Keywords

References

-  رفیع‌پور، سعید، داداش پور، هاشم، و رفیعیان، مجتبی (1389). بررسی ظرفیت‌های سرمایه اجتماعی در چارچوب برنامه‌ریزی محله- مبنا نمونه مورد مطالعه محله فیروزسالار گوگان. برنامه‌ریزی رفاه و توسعه اجتماعی، 3، 203-۲۳۹.
-  سازمان فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات شهرداری تهران (۱۳۹۶). آمارنامه شهر تهران، ۱۳۹۵. سازمان فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات شهرداری تهران.
-  قرائی، آزاده، زبردست، اسفندیار، و ماجدی، حمید (۱۳۹۷). تبیین ارتباط میان فرم شهر و پایداری اجتماعی، نمونه موردی: مناطق ۲۲گانه شهر تهران.نشریه برنامه‌ریزی توسعه کالبدی، ۳(۷)، ۷۹-۹۳.
-  مرکز آمار ایران (۱۳۹۰). نتایج تفصیلی سرشماری نفوس و مسکن عمومی کل کشور، سال ۱۳۹۰. مرکز آمار ایران.
-  مهدیزاده، جواد. (١۳۸۱). شهر و تاریخ: دوره تکوین و شکل گیری تهران قدیم (بخش نخست) (نظری به روند تاریخی توسعه کالبدی فضایی شهر تهران). جستارهای شهرسازی، ۲، ۱۳-۲۲ .
-  نیک‌پور، عامر، محمودی پاتی، فرزین، و حاتمی‌کیا، ستاره (۱۳۹۴). بررسی و تحلیل وضعیت پایداری اجتماعی در شهر آمل، نشریه جغرافیا و پایداری محیط، ۱۴، ۴۳-۵۶.
 
-   Ali, H. H., Al-Betawi, Y. N., & Al-Qudah, H. S. (2019). Effects of urban form on social sustainability–A case study of Irbid, Jordan. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 11(2), 203-222.
-   Biart, M. (2002). Social sustainability as part of the social agenda of the European community. In Thomas Ritt (eds.) Soziale Nachhaltigkeit: Von der Umweltpolitik zur Nachhaltigkeit? (5–10). Vienna: Arbeiterkammer Wien.
-   Bramley, G., Brown, C., Dempsey, N., Power, S., and Watkins, D. (2010). Social acceptability. In Mike Jenks and Colin Jones (eds.), Dimensions of the Sustainable City 2 (105– 128). Future City Series, Vol. 2. London: Springer.
-   Bramley, G., & Power, S. (2009). Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(1), 30-48.
-   Brundtland Commission (1987). Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment.
-   Burton, E. (2000). The potential of the compact city for promoting social equity. In Katie Williams, Elizabeth Burton and Mike Jenks (eds.), Achieving Sustainable Urban Form (19-29). E & FN Sp on, London.
-   Caliskan, O., & Marshall, S. (2011). Urban morphology and design: Introduction. Built Environment, 37(4), 381-392.
-   Clifton, K., Ewing, R., Knaap, G. J., & Song, Y. (2008). Quantitative analysis of urban form: a multidisciplinary review. Journal of Urbanism, 1(1), 17-45.
-   Colantonio, A. (2011). Social sustainability: exploring the linkages between research, policy and practice. In Jaeger, C. C., Tabara, J. D., Jaeger, J. (eds.), European research on sustainable development (35-57). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
-   Colantonio, A., & Dixon, T. (2011). Urban regeneration & social sustainability: Best practice from European cities.Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
-   Dave, S. (2011). Neighbourhood density and social sustainability in cities of developing countries. Sustainable Development, 19(3), 189-205.
-   Dempsey, N., Brown, C., & Bramley, G. (2012). The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Progress in Planning, 77(3), 89-141.
-   Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone Pub.
-   Ghahramanpouri, A., Lamit, H., & Sedaghatnia, S. (2013). Urban social sustainability trends in research literature.Asian Social Science, 9(4), 185-193.
-   Haughton, G., & Hunter, C. (2004). Sustainable cities. London: Routledge.
-   Hediger, W. (2000). Sustainable development and social welfare. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 481 -492. 
-   Hemani, S., & Das, A. K. (2016). Humanising urban development in India: call for a more comprehensive approach to social sustainability in the urban policy and design context. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development,8(2), 144-173.
-   Jabareen, Y. R. (2006). Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of planning education and research, 26(1), 38-52.
-   Jenks, M. (2006). City Form: The Sustainable Urban Form Consortium. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, 4, 89-102.
-   Jenks, M., & Jones, C. (2010). Dimensions of the sustainable city. Dordrecht: Springer.
-   Kearns, A. & Turok, I. (2003). Sustainable Communities: Dimensions and Challenges. Liverpool John Moores University, ESRC Cities Programme and Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
-   Keylock, C. J. (2005). Simpson diversity and the Shannon–Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy. Oikos, 109(1), 203-207.
-   Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory.International journal of sustainable development, 8(1-2), 65-79.
-   Manzi, T., Lucas, K., Jones, T. L., & Allen, J. (Eds.). (2010). Social sustainability in urban areas: communities, connectivity and the urban fabric. Routledge.
-   Meadowcroft, J. (1999).The Politics of Sustainable Development: Emergent Arenas and Challenges for Political Science. International Political Science Review, 20 (2), 219–237.
-   Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on Predicaments. New York: Universe Book.
-   Moudon, A. V. (1986). Built for change: neighborhood architecture in San Francisco. Cambridge: Mit Press.
-   O'Riordan, T. (1998). Indicators for Sustainable Development in Proceedings of the European Commission (Environment and Climate Programme) Advanced Study Course, Delft, The Netherlands. 
-   Oswald, F., & Baccini, P. (2003). Networkcity: Designing the Urban. Berlin: Birkhäuser.
-   Polèse, M., & Stren, R. E. (Eds.) (2000). The social sustainability of cities: Diversity and the management of change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
-   Rainwater, L. (1974). What money buys: Inequality and the social meanings of income. New York: Basic Books.
-   Sachs, I. (1999). Social sustainability and whole development: Exploring the dimensions of sustainable development in Becker Egon & Jahn Thomas (eds.), Sustainability and the Social Sciences: A Crossdisciplinary Approach to Integrating Environmental Considerations into Theoretical Reorientation (25–36). London: Zed Books.
-   Selkirk, K. E. (1982). Pattern and place: an introduction to the mathematics of geography. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-   Tolentino, A. (2011) Suburban Tissue Analysis and Retrofitability: Creating A Catalogue And Scoring System For Potential Retrofit Sites. Georgia Institute of Technology. http://www.cnu.org/sites/www.cnu.org/files/armantolentino_suburban_tissue_ analysis_and_retrofitability_1.pdf, accessed 8 July 2018.
-   Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum,42(3), 342-348.
-   Williams, K., Burton, E., & Jenks, M. (2000). Achieving sustainable urban form: an introduction. In Katie Williams, Elizabeth Burton and Mike Jenks (eds.), Achieving sustainable urban form (1-5). London: E & FN Spon.
-   Woodcraft, S., Hackett, T. and Caistor-Arendar, L. (2011). Design for Social Sustainability: A Framework for Creating Thriving New Communities. London: The Young Foundation.
Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning
Volume 13, Issue 28
September 2020
Pages 5-28

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics