Parametric Design of a Kinetic Facade for the Improvement of Daylight Performance and Visual Comfort Case Study: An Office Space in Tehran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.A. in Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

4 Associate professor, Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Daylighting has significant impacts on the physiological and psychological needs of people in addition to reducing energy consumption. Furthermore, it should be noted that excessive daylight can cause visual discomfort and glare. Therefore, the reasons for the growing attention towards the responsive kinetic skins are increasing the indoor lighting levels while controlling glare and providing visual comfort due to different weather conditions during the year. This research proposes and evaluates a sun-responsive kinetic skin consisting of an Islamic pattern for the improvement of indoor environmental conditions.  The use of Islamic patterns has a long history and a special significance in Iranian-Islamic architecture, and its geometric and iterative design is correspondent with the idea of the kinetic skin. With the aim of increasing the illuminance level while reducing the risk of glare, the minimum and maximum solar altitude angles are considered corresponding to the skin opening ratio (50-100%), so that the lowest solar altitude angle is corresponding to the highest opening ratio, and the highest solar altitude angle is corresponding to the lowest opening ratio. The case study is a 7-meter deep south-oriented office space in Tehran. The depth of 7-meter is commonly used for conceptual design explorations and it is also chosen to be this large so that the effect of daylighting remains visible for all adaptive façade variations. Furthermore, horizontal louvers are deployed among the facade to control excessive unwanted daylight. The aim of this study is to provide a visual comfort level based on the LEED certificate. According to LEED, spatial daylight autonomy (SDA) of at least 50%, and annual sunlight exposure (ASE) of no more than 10% is recommended. The proposed envelope was evaluated using Grasshopper/Rhino for parametric simulation, Ladybug for inputting time zones and delivering sun position coordinates, Honeybee for analyzing daylight and glare, and online software ‘Design Explorer’ for extracting optimum solutions. The reflectance of the floor, ceiling, and walls are considered 20%, 80% and 50%, respectively, according to the conventional materials. Louver depth (50 and 100 centimeters), louver material (plastic and aluminium), glass material (double glazed low emissivity glass, and double-glazed clear glass), and the kinetic skin material (plastic and aluminium) were considered as input variables. Test points were chosen 0.5 meters apart and 0.8 meters high from the floor (desk height). The glare analyses were conducted during the winter solstice (December 21st), spring equinox (March 21st), autumn equinox (September 23st), and the summer solstice (June 21st) at 09:00h, 12:00h, and 16:00h, in order to meet extreme sun angles. In this study, 360 glare analyses and 30 annual daylight analyses were performed. The results show that the proposed system is efficiently capable of achieving imperceptible glare most of the time and providing the improvement of daylight performance and visual comfort level based on the LEED certificate. Useful daylight illuminance (UDI) increases by around 20 percent. Despite the decrease in spatial daylight autonomy (SDA) by around 3-20 percent, annual solar exposure (ASE) decreases by around 40-50 percent.

Keywords

References

-     انصاری، جمال (1366). گچبری دوران ساسانی و تأثیر آن در هنر‌های اسلامی. فصلنامه هنر، 13، 318-373.
-     بورکهارت، تیتوس (1365). هنر اسلامی، زبان و بیان (مترجم: مسعود رجب نیا). تهران: سروش.  
-     پوپ، آرتور، و بالتروشایتس، یورگیس (1384). نقوش پیشینه‌دار (مترجم: ژیلبرت صدیق پور). ژیلبرت صدیق‌پور.
-     سیلوایه، سونیا، دانشجو، خسرو، و فرمهین فراهانی، سعید (1392). هندسه در معماری ایران پیش از اسلام و تجلی آن در معماری معاصر ایران. نقش جهان، 3 (1)، 55-66.
-     کیانی، محمد یوسف (1370). تزئینات وابسته به معماری ایران. تهران: سازمان میراث فرهنگی کشور.
-     میرزایی، عبدالله (1391). بررسی سیر تکامل اسلیمی در هنر ایران. کتاب ماه هنر، 164، 54-57.
-     نصراللهی، فرشاد (1390). ضوابط معماری و شهرسازی کاهش دهنده مصرف انرژی ساختمان‌ها. تهران: نشست کمیته ملی انرژی ایران.
-     ویلسون، آوا (1388). طرح‌های اسلامی (مترجم: محمدرضا ریاضی). تهران: سمت.
 
-         Arif, M., Katafygiotou, M., Mazroei, A., Kaushik, A., & Elsarrag, E. (2016). Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: a review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5 (1), 1-11.
-         Attia, S., Bilir, S., Safy, T., Struck, C., Loonen, R., & Goia, F. (2018). Current trends and future challenges in the performance assessment of adaptive facade systems. Energy and Buildings, 179, 165-182. 
-         Bian, Y., Leng, Y., & Ma, Y. (2018). A proposed discomfort glare evaluation method based on the concept of ‘adaptive zone’. Building and Environment, 143, 306-317.
-         Carlucci, S., Causone, F., De Rosa, F., & Pagliano, L. (2015). A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 1016-1033.
-         CEN (2011). EN 12464-1: Light and lighting-lighting of work places, part 1: indoor work places. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
-         Choi, S. J., Lee, D. S., & Jo, J. H. (2017). Lighting and cooling energy assessment of multi-purpose control strategies for external movable shading devices by using shaded fraction. Energy and Buildings, 150, 328-338.
-         Eltaweel, A., & Su, Y. (2017). Parametric design and daylighting: a literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 1068–1103.
-         Hammad, F. (2010). The energy savings potential of using dynamic external louvers in an office building. Energy and Buildings, 82, 1888-1895.
-         Hassan, A., Abdin, A., & Ezzeldin, S. (2017). Parallel Parametric Simulation for Optimizing Non-Conventional Solar Screens: An Approach for Balancing Daylight and Thermal Performance in Hot Arid Climates. International Conference for Sustainable Design of the Built Environment-SDBE London, 257-268.
-         Kalogirou, A. S. (2015). Building integration of solar renewable energy systems towards zero or nearly zero energy buildings. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technelogy, 10 (4), 379-385.
-         Kirimtat, A., Koyunbaba, B., Chatzikonstantinou, I., & Sariyildiz, S. (2016). Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 23-49.
-         Kontovourkis, O., Michael, A., Alexandrou, K., & Vassiliades, C. (2015). Lighting performance simulation and adaptive control of an advanced building skin based on human behaviour inputs. 10th International Conference On Advanced Building Skins, Bern Switzerland, 1340-1349.
-         Loonen, R., Trčka, M., Cóstola, D., & Hensen, J. (2013). Climate adaptive building shells: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 483-493.
-         Mahmoud, A. H. A., & Elghazi, Y. (2016). Parametric-based designs for kinetic facades to optimize daylight performance: Comparing rotation and translation kinetic motion for hexagonal facade patterns. Solar Energy, 126, 111-127.
-         Mardaljevic, J., Heschong, L., & Lee, E. (2009). Daylight metrics and energy savings. Lighting Research and Technology, 41, 261–283.
-         Michael, A. (2012). Natural lighting in the indoor environment. In A. M_endez Vilas (Ed.), Fuelling the Future: Advances in Science and Technologies for Energy Generation, Transmission and Storage. Florida, USA: Brown Walker.
-         Michael, A., Eftychi, M., & Pattichi, E. (2015). Innovative integrated concept for an environmentally friendly and energy efficient building envelope. The 10th International Conference On Advanced Building Skins, Bern Switzerland, 1360-1369. 
-         Michael, A. G., Alexandrou, K. C., Konatzii, P. G., & Kalli, A. K. (2016). An environmental renovation strategy based on adaptive control optimisation of a modular light regulating façade system. The 6th International Conference On Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature, Eco-Architecture, Alicante, Spain, 142-153.
-         Michael, A., Gregoriou, S., & Kalogirou, S. A. (2018). Environmental assessment of an integrated adaptive system for the improvement of indoor visual comfort of existing buildings. Renewable Energy, 115, 620-633
-         Palmero-Marrero, A. I., & Oliveira, A. C. (2010). Effect of louver shading devices on building energy requirements. Applied Energy, 87 (6), 2040-2049.
-         Reinhart, C. F., Jakubiec, J. A., & Ibarra, D. (2013). Definition of a reference office for standardized evaluations of dynamic façade and lighting technologies. The 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Chambery, France, 3645-3652.
-         Reinhart, C. F., & Wienold, J. (2012). The daylighting dashboard: A simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces. Building and Environment, 46, 386-396.
-         Tabadkani, A., Valinejad Shoubi, M., Soflaei, F., & Banihashemi, S. (2019). Integrated parametric design of adaptive facades for user's visual comfort. Automation in Construction, 106, 1-19.
-         USGBC (2015). Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). U.S: Green Building Council.
-         Xue, P., Mak, C., & Huang, Y. (2016). Quantification of luminous comfort with dynamic daylight metrics in residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 117, 99-108.
 
Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning
Volume 13, Issue 31
July 2021
Pages 85-100

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics