“Problem-finding” of Tehran’s Urban Planning System Using the Integrated, Knowledge-Based Strategic Spatial Planning Cycle

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, School of Architecture & Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, School of Architecture & Urban Planning, Isfahan University of Art, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

The prevalence of non-spatial approaches and physical determinism in the management of spatial changes and solving urban problems in the Tehran Metropolitan has led to a situation in which urban plans such as Tehran’s Master Plan (2007) and the 22 District plans of Tehran metropolitan (2012) have been less than successful in fulfilling expectations regarding the urban spatial system and uncertainties affecting such systems. Dealing with urban problems and uncertainties affecting strategic decision-making including those associated with the planning environment, the guiding values of the planning process, and finally those associated with the decisions made by other stakeholders through strategic spatial planning in an era characterized by an accumulation of knowledge and information, would require knowledge management. Urban Planning problems due to spatial and political nature of planning will not fit into traditional information systems. This fact shifts the emphasis and application of information systems and “knowledge-management” in urban planning from a mere technical to a broader context suitable for the rationale of a strategic spatial planning. Knowledge-management as a set of procedures, infrastructures, technical and managerial tools is a designed process towards creating, sharing and leveraging information and knowledge within and around organizations. The absence of an urban knowledge management system has increased the dynamism and complexity of urban problems. In fact, creation of such a system as an important component of the efficiency of any urban planning system has been largely overlooked in both planning research and practice. This paper is an attempt to answer two basic questions: first, what challenges does Tehran’s urban planning system face from the perspective of a knowledge-based strategic spatial planning system based on the principles of knowledge management? And second, what is the appropriate management model to be applied in Tehran’s urban planning system? Dealing with these two questions will help us achieve the main purpose of this paper: enhancing Tehran’s urban planning system through application of the principles of strategic spatial planning and knowledge management (knowledge-based strategic spatial planning). To this end, a qualitative research approach based on a two-stage descriptive-analytic and analytic-prescriptive process has been adopted. Systematic review of the research literature constitutes the first stage of this methodology. The second stage deals with "progressive abstraction problem-finding", focus group method, content analysis and the “conceptual suitability”. Our findings indicate that knowledge management enhances the efficiency of Tehran’s urban planning system in the framework of the strategic spatial planning approach through the generation and application of all types of knowledge, providing the context for learning from knowledge, creating a flexible knowledge base, promoting knowledge exchange, raising public awareness and the promotion of a knowledge application culture. However, the absence of belief in knowledge management and strategic thinking within the formal institutional structures (such as the legal system, governance and organizations) and informal institutions (such as culture, history and public beliefs) constitutes the main challenge facing Tehran’s urban planning system.

Keywords

References

-  عبدی دانشپور، زهره (1382). برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی و برنامه‌ریزی اختیار راهبردی: ویژگی‌ها، تفاوت‌ها و پیش شرط‌ها. مدیریت شهری، 14، 14-23.
-  عبدی دانشپور، زهره، ابراهیم نیا، وحیده، و محمودپور، ئه‌سرین (1393). تدبیر چارچوب مدیریت دانش برای سیاست گذاری یکپارچه در کلان شهر تهران. هنرهای زیبا معماری و شهرسازی، 19(1)، 57-70.
-  منصوری، امیر (1395). نقد و بررسی طرح جامع تهران 1386، تهران: پژوهشکده نظر.
-  مهندسین مشاور بوم سازگان (1386). سند اصلی مصوب طرح جامع (راهبردی- ساختاری) شهر تهران. شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران.
 
-   Albrechts, L. (2001). In Pursuit of New Approaches to Strategic Spatial Planning. A European Perspective.International Planning Studies, 6(3), 293–310.
-   Albrechts, L. (2006). Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1149 - 1170.
-   Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B, 31, 743–758.
-   Anand, A. and Singh, M. (2011). Understanding Knowledge Management: A Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3(2), 926-939.
-   Bryson, J. (2004). Comment Represented in “Strategic Spatial Planning and Longer Range: by Jhon Friedmann.Planning Theory and Practice, 5(1), 49–67.
-   Brayson, J. M. (1995). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organization: a guide to strengthening and sustaining organization achievements. San Francisco: Jossey-bass.
-   Davoudi, S., & Strange, I. (2009). Conceptions of space and place in strategic spatial planning. London: Routledge.
-   Healey, P., Khakee, A., Motte, A., & Needham, B. (eds.) (1997). Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovations in Europe. London: UCL Press.
-   Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Macmillan International Higher Education. Vancouver: UBC Press, 
-   Healey, P. (2007). Urban Complexities and Spatial Strategies, toward a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.
-   Hyslop, J. (2004). Comment Represented in “Strategic Spatial Planning and Longer Range” by Jhon Friedmann.Planning Theory and Practice, 5(1), 49–67.
-   Klosterman, R. (1997). Planning Support Systems: A New Perspective on Computer-Aided Planning. Urban Studies, 17 (1), 45-54.
-   Lönnqvist, A., & Laihonen, H. (2013). Managing regional development: A knowledge perspective. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 4(1), 50-63.
-   Otim, S. (2006). A Case-Based Knowledge Management System for Disaster Management: Fundamental Concepts,Proceedings of the 3rd International ISCRAM Conference, 598-604.
-   Quintas P., Lefrere P., & Jones G. (1997). Knowledge Management: a strategic agenda. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 385-391.
-   Rantanen, H. (2007). Mapping and managing local knowledge in urban planning. International Conference ‘Sustainable Urban Area, Rotterdam, 1-18.
-   Rubenstein-Montano, B., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., McCaw, D., Newman, B., & Rebeck, K. (2001). A Systems Thinking Framework for Knowledge Management. Decision Support Systems, 31, 5-16.
-   Rubenstein-Montano, B. (2000). A Survey of Knowledge-Based Information Systems for Urban Planning: Moving Towards Knowledge Management. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24, (3), 155-172.
-   Vasilevska, L., & Vasić, M. (2009). Strategic planning as a regional development policy mechanism-European context. SPATIUM International Review, 21, 19-26.
-   Vonk, G., & Geertman S. (2008). Knowledge-Based Planning Using Planning Support Systems: Practice-Oriented Lessons, In Yigitcanlar T, Velibeyoglu K and Baum S (Eds.), Creative Urban Regions: Harnessing Urban Technologies to Support Knowledge City Initiatives, Information Science Reference, 203-217.
Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning
Volume 12, Issue 25
February 2020
Pages 61-43

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics