Assessing the Effective Elements of Acoustic Comfort and Soundscape Imageability of Users in the Naghsh-e-Jahan Square, Isfahan

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M. A. in Urban Design, Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Isfahan University of Art, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Nowadays, increasing and various sound sources such as traffic, human activities and disturbing sounds, have made a displeasing soundscape that leads to a turbulent perception of soundscape for people. These indicate the importance of paying attention to the soundscape quality in urban spaces. Naghsh-e-Jahan Square as an urban space is not an exception to this and there are variety of auditory potentials that can be heard so that may produce an unpleasant feeling of soundscape of square. Assessment and identification of pleasant and unpleasant sounds from the viewpoint of users including Iranian tourists, foreign tourists, merchants and Isfahan residents who visit the square is of great importance. In this regard this study aimed to assess the perception of people with regard to Naghsh-e-Jahan Square soundscape quality. This research is a practical and analytical research in terms of nature. For qualitative evaluation, first the researchers identified the sound sources via sound walks and recording. Psychoacoustic approach has been adopted in this research. Then, psychoacoustic questionnaires including four segments were used. Questionnaires include 4 parts: (1) personal information and the reason and number of visits, (2) pleasantness of sound sources, (3) open questions to identify the auditory imageability elements, and (4) semantic differential scale to assess the overall characteristics of soundscape in Naghshe-Jahan square. Totally, 385 questionnaires were filled by people in the square after sound walks. Sound walks have been performed on common week days in winter and spring 2016. Respondents were free to choose the desired path in the square but they had been asked to visit all of the spaces and parts of the square to have a comprehensive visit. Results revealed that soundscape quality of Naghsh-e-Jahan square is positive from user's perception. Results also showed the quality of Naghsh-e-Jahan square is affected by pleasant sounds such as horse carriage sound, Azan sound, activities such as metal artworks and unpleasant sounds such as motorcycle and cars noise, environmental equipment noise. To achieve a high quality soundscape, it is necessary to reduce unpleasant sounds and to increase the number and frequency of pleasant sounds. Auditory imageability elements were including: sound marks such as horse and carriage and metal art works sounds that were assessed positively by respondents. Sound signals included Azan, carriage and vehicles sounds, and vehicles sounds were assessed negatively by people. The vehicles noise should be eliminated or controlled. Keynotes were fountains and carriages and footsteps. This means that people hear foreground sounds more than background sounds. There is a need to make horse and carriage sound more distinct so that people can realize the background sounds and foreground sounds. Auditory rhythms included Azan and fountains. Preserving the Azan sound and rhythmic activity of fountains is of great importance. As a whole, results showed that people’s perception is the most important parameter in soundscape pleasantness. Achieving soundscape pleasantness and providing a design framework to enhance and reinforce positive soundscape requires further complimentary studies that can open new windows to this field of study. 

Keywords

References

-  امیدی آوج، مریم و عبدلی کلشتری، مهتاب (1393). «تأثیر منظر صوتی بر ارتقاء کیفیت محیط فضاهای عمومی شهری»، اولین کنگره سراسری دستاوردهای نوین ایران با هدف دستیابی به توسعه پایدار.
-  بنتلی، ایان؛ الکک، آلن؛ مورین، پال؛ مک گلین، سو و گراهام، اسمیت (1390). محیط‌های پاسخده، ترجمه مصطفی بهزادفر، انتشارات دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران.
-  پاکزاد، جهانشاه (1392). سیر اندیشه‌ها در شهرسازی: از کمیت تا واقعیت، انتشارات آرمانشهر، تهران.
-  حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا (1388). مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی، انتشارات سمت، تهران.
-  شهابیان، پویان؛ لاریمیان، فرزانه (1395). «بررسی منظر صوتی خیابان ولی‌عصر تهران با تاکید بر ادراک مردم از منظر صوتی»، آرمانشهر، 17(19)، 237-248.
-  شیخ بگلو، رعنا (1394). «نقش منظر صوتی در مطلوبیت ادراک فضاهای شهری از دیدگاه شهروندان (مطالعۀ موردی: شهروندان شهر شیراز)»، نخستین کنفرانس ملی معماری، موسیقی و ادبیات، تهران.
-  لقمانی، حدیث و غفاری، عباس (1393). «ارزیابی نقش صوت در ارتقاء کیفیت محیط و نحوۀ استفاده شهروندان از فضا»، اولین کنفرانس ملی جغرافیا، گردشگری، منابع طبیعی و توسعۀ پایدار، تهران.
-  منتظرالحجه، محمدرضا؛ شریف نژاد، مجتبی؛ منتظرالحجه، مهدی و انصاری، مجتبی (1395) «بررسی تطبیقی منظر صوتی شهروندان در میدان خان و میدان جانبازان یزد»، کنفرانس بین المللی مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، تهران.
 
-  Adams, M., Cox, T., Moore, G., Croxford. B., Refaee, M. & Sharples, S. (2006). “Sustainable soundscapes: Noise policy and the urban experience”, Urban Studies, 43, 13, 2385-2398.
-  Adams, M., Bruce, N., Davices, W., Cain, R., Jennings, P., Carlyle, A., & Cusack (2008). “Sound walking as methodology for understanding Soundscapes”, Proceedings of the institute of Acoustics, 30, 51-59.
-  Bruce. S., Neil, D.W., & Adams, M. (2009). “Expectation as a factor in the perception of Soundscape”, Euro noise, October 26-28, Edinburg, Scotland.
-  Brambilla, G., Gallo, V., & Zambon, G. (2013). “The soundscape quality in some urban parks in Milan, Italy”, Journal of Public Health, 10, 2348-2369.
-  Blanco, G. G., Igone, G. P., Saloga, A., Garcia B., Itziar, Herranpascual, I., & Karmele (2012). “Actions to improve soundscape in the “Plaza NEUVA” in Bilbao”, AESOP 26th Annual Congress, 11-15 July, METU, Ankara.
-  Baldinelli, G., Sberna, A., Dalessandro, F., & Asdrubali, F (2012). “Redevelopment of an Urban Open Public Space Using The Soundscape Approach: A Cace Study in CITTA DI CASTELLO, ITALY”, Proceedings of the Internoise, Agust 19-22, New York City.
-  Bull, M. (2013). Sound studies, Taylor and Francis Ltd Publications.
-  Cain, R., Jennings, P., Adams, M., Bruce, N., Carlyle, A., Cusack, P., Davies, W., Hume. K. & Plack, C. (2008). “An activity-centric conceptual framework for assessing and creating positive urban soundscapes”, Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 30, 2, 546-551.
-  Davise, W.J., Adams, M.D., Bruce, N.S., Cain, R., Carlyle, A., Cusack, P., Hall, D.A., Hume, K.L., Irwin, A., Jennings, P., Marselle, M.R., Plack, C.J., & Poxon, J. (2013). “Perception of Soundscape: An Interdisciplinary Approach”, Applied Acoustics, 74, 2, 224-231.
-  Drever, J. (2005). Soundscape and acoustic ecology, University of London, London.
-  Edensor, T. (2009). Geographic's of rhythm: nature/ place, mobility and bodies, Routledge, Burlington.
-  -Farina, A. (2014). Soundscape Ecology, Principles, Patterns, Methods and Applications, Springer, New York.
-  Frisby, K. (1994). The flaˆneur in Social Theory, Routledge, London.
-  Jeon, J., & Jik L. P. (2008). “Sound walk for evaluating community noise annoyance in urban spaces”, 9th international congress on noise as a public health problem (ICBEN), Fox woods, CT.
-  Jeon J. Y., Lee, P. J., You, J., & Kang, J. (2010). “Perceptual assessment of quality of urban soundscapes with combined noise sources and water sounds”, Acoustic Society of America, 127, 3, 1357–1366.
-  Kang, J. (2006). Urban Sound Environment, Taylor and Francis, London and New York.
-  Kang, J., & Zhang, M. (2010). “Soundscape differential analysis of soundscape in urban open public space”, Building and Environment, 45, 150-157.
-  Krause B. (1987). “Bioacoustics, habitat ambience in ecological balance”, Whole Earth Review, 57: 14–18.
-  Lam K.C., Ng, S.L., Hui, W.C., & Chan, P.K. (2005). “Environmental quality of urban parks and open spaces in Hong Kong”, Environmental monitoring and assessment, 111, 1-3, 55-73.
-  Mohammad Rehan, R. (2015). “The phonic identity of city urban soundscape for sustainable spaces”, HBRC journal, 12, 3, 337-349.
-  Nyunt, K. (2004). “Waterfront soundscape of Auckland”, Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Acoustics, 1, 215-216.
-  Nilsson, M.E. (2007). “Soundscape quality in urban open spaces”, Paper presented at Inter-Noise, in Istanbul, Turkey, 28th – 31st August.
-  Nilsson, M.E., & Berglund, B. (2006). “Soundscape quality in suburban green areas and city parks”, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 92, 6, 903-911.
-  Payne, S., Davies, W., & Mags, A (2009). Research into the Practical and Policy Applications of Soundscape Concepts and Techniques in Urban Areas (NANR 200), Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
-  Pijanowski, B. C., Villanueva-Rivera, L. J., Dumyahn, S.L., Farina, A., Krause, BL., Napoletano, B M., Gage, Stuart H., & Pieretti, N (2011). “Soundscape Ecology: the science of sound in the landscape”, Bioscience, 61, 3, 203-216.
-  Polli, A. (2012). “Soundscape, sonification and sound activism”, AI & Soc, 27, 257-268.
-  Ren, X., & Kang, J. (2015). “Effects of the visual landscape factors of an ecological waterscape on acoustic comfort”, Applied Acoustics, 96, 171-179.
-  Ruitter, E. P. J. (2005). “Soundscape, Privacy, Communication and orientation”, international conference' Doing, thinking, feeling home: the mental geography of residential environment, Delf, The Netherland, October 14-15.
-  Schafer, R. M. (1977). The Soundscape., our sonic environment and the tuning of the world, Destiny Books, Rochester.
-  South Worth, M. (1969). “The sonic Environment of Cities”, The Journal of Environ Behave, 1, 49-70
-  Stammers, J., & Chesmore, D. (2008). “Instrument for soundscape recognition, Identification and evaluation: Signal classification”, Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 123, 5.
-  Vermir, G., Domecka, M., & Rychtarikova, M. (2008). “The application of the soundscape approach in the evaluation of the urban public space”, Acoustical society of America, 123, 1-6.
-  Yang, W., & Kang, J. (2005a). “Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces”. Applied Acoustics, 66, 211-229.
-  Yang, W. & Kang, J. (2005b). “Soundscape and sound preference in urban squares: a case study in Sheffield”, Journal of Urban Design, 10, 1, 61-80.
Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning
Volume 10, Issue 19
December 2017
Pages 133-152

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics