Exploring the impact of world heritage registration on the quality of social life continuity in the historic city of Yazd

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.A. in Restoration and Revitalization of Historical Buildings and Urban Fabrics, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Iran University of Art, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Restoration and Revitalization of Historical Buildings and Urban Fabrics, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Iran University of Art

Abstract

 Historic cities are intricate, dynamic systems characterized by the interdependent interplay of physical structures, cultural practices, social interactions, economic activities, and managerial frameworks. The preservation and continuity of social life—defined here as the sustained patterns of community relations, neighborhood-based activities, intergenerational transmission of traditions, collective memory, place attachment, and everyday lived experiences—represent a cornerstone of authentic heritage conservation. Without vibrant social vitality, historic urban fabrics risk becoming static museums rather than living entities. The inscription of historic cities on the UNESCO World Heritage List introduces a pivotal shift, enhancingglobal recognition while imposing new dynamics that profoundly affect physical, cultural, social, and administrative dimensions. This process can create opportunities for enhanced protection and revitalization but also poses significant threats, including commodification, displacement, and the erosion of local socio-cultural fabrics.
Despite the emergence of modern approaches, such as the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL), which link physical conservation to social dynamics, a practical gap has emerged in Yazd between conservation goals and residents lived realities. Although the management plan aimed to improve residents` quality of life, observations reveal population shifts, declining social participation, and the conversion of living spaces into tourism venues. This research analyzes the impact of Yazd`s registration on the continuity of social life and its relationship with challenges to urban vitality.
Conducted within an interpretive paradigm and using a qualitative approach, the study employed inductive content analysis due to the limited availability of prior data on the social impacts of heritage registration in Iranian cities. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 30 experts, activists, and researchers in conservation, architecture, urban planning, and sociology, selected via purposive and snowball sampling based on their in-depth knowledge of changes occurring before and after registration. Focusing on experts provided broader insights into and analytical depth regarding the links between management and social dynamics.
The interviews totaling 1,110 minutes, were analyzed using MAXQDA, yielding 530 initial codes that were refined into 42 categories and ultimately grouped into eight main themes forming the conceptual framework of the social consequences of registration in Yazd. The analysis revealed that the inscription of Yazd on the World Heritage List has generated eight major trends in the city`s social life, resulting in a complex and often contradictory situation:

Emergence of New Patterns of Presence in Space: Registration has attracted new social groups, transforming patterns of presence within the historic fabric. Activities such as "texture tourism" (Baft-Gardi), café culture, cultural events, and the influx of students and creative class have turned the area into a "social showcase" and leisure destination. This has added dynamism but shifted the nature of urban life from residential to performative and consumptive.
Formation of Coexistence, Competition, and Conflict: The presence drivers users (including traditional residents, tourists, investors, and foreign nationals), has generatedcompetition and conflict over space, interests, and values. Although some forms of coexistence have emerged, tensions persist between residents` need for peace and tourism related activities, as well as between the cultural values of local residents and newcomers.
Selective Concentration and Unbalanced Distribution: Post-registration development has been uneven, with investment and attention concentrated along tourism corridors and in central neighborhoods (e.g., Fahadan and the Jame Mosque area). Other areas within the buffer zone remain isolated, experiencing spatial injustice despite their potential.
Prevalence of Formalism and One-Dimensional Physicalism: Physical conservation and restoration have improved, but the focus remains on the "shell" and appearance of the historic fabric. This physically dominanted approach has neglected social meanings and residents` everyday needs (e.g., local services), reducing conservation to cosmetic changes intended to support tourism.
Fading and Declining Continuity of Residence: Indigenous residency is declining, despite revitalization goals. Insufficient financial and technical support for residents, combined with intrusive tourism activities, has made living in the area less desirable, leading to the replacement of local residents by temporary or immigrant groups. Social life has shifted from a continuous, neighborhood-based pattern to an event-based and episodic one.
Change in Discourse and Public Attitude: Registration has elevated the value of heritage in public discourse. However, this narrative has been dominated by official and tourism-oriented perspectives, marginalizing local micro-narratives and lived experiences under the broader World Heritage meta-narrative.
Transformation of Spatial Content: Activities and land uses have changed, with non-native investors treating space as a commodity. Houses have become capital assets and consumption venues, altering functional authenticity in favor of market logic a process that can be analyzed through the "concept of the “second circuit of capital.
Passive and Inefficient Management: The management structure has not adapted to the complexities arising from registration. The Lack of integrated urban management, transparent regulations, and genuine public participation has led to passive responses that fail to balance conservation and development.

Analysis of the findings indicates that Yazd's inscription on the World Heritage List, rather than ensuring stable conservation, has resulted in "Unstable Mutability." Under this condition, the historic city oscillates between rigid physical preservation and unchecked economic exploitation. The concept of "continuity"—traditionally understood as the persistence of values, relationships, and collective memory—has been replaced by frequent, and unstable changes driven by external factors such as fluctuations in tourism.
This research reveals a substantial gap between UNESCO's theoretical approaches, such as the Historic Urban Landscape, which emphasizes the integration of social and physical dimensions, and the practical reality in Yazd. Although registration has enhanced the city's global brand and drawn attention to its physical heritage values, the lack of a community-oriented strategic plan has prevented it from protecting "social life" as the spirit of the place. The dominance of a form-oriented and economy-driven approach has caused the exchange value of space to surpass its use and ritual values, marginalizing indigenous residents—the primary bearers of intangible heritage—or redefining their roles in performative them.
Ultimately, the continuity of social life in Yazd depends on a transition from "Physical-Centric Conservation" to "Community-Centric Conservation." This requires a fundamental revision of management structures, recognition of residents`  right to the city, equitable distribution of the benefits of World Heritage registration, and the establishment of a balance between the tourism industry and the requirements of sustainable living. Without this revision, Yazd may preserve its earthen body, but its social and semantic essence will be sacrificed to commodification and museumification. The findings of this research serve as a warning to policymakers emphasizing that the sustainability of a historic city cannot be achieved solely by preserving buildings but also requires keeping the authentic flow of life alive within the veins of this ancient urban fabric.

Keywords

Main Subjects


آقایی، پرویز؛ توکلی‌نیا، جمیله؛ کلانتری، محسن و فنی، زهره (۱۳۹۸). تولید و بازتولید فضا در چرخه دوم انباشت سرمایه؛ نقدی بر زندگی روزمره در فضای زیسته. باغ نظر، ۱۶(۸۰)، ۲۹–۴۰. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2019.151034.3799
اسمیت، سدونی و واتسون، جولیا (۱۴۰۱). ادبیات من: راهی به فهم خود، زندگی‌نگاری و روایت‌های شخصی. ترجمه رویا پورآذر. نشر اطراف.
پاکزاد، جهانشاه (۱۳۹۱). مبانی نظری و فرایند طراحی شهری. انتشارات شهیدی.
پایگاه میراث فرهنگی شهر تاریخی یزد (۱۳۹۴). پرونده پیشنهاد ثبت شهر تاریخی یزد در فهرست میراث جهانی.
پایگاه میراث جهانی شهر تاریخی یزد (۱۳۹۶). مروری بر پلان مدیریت پرونده ثبت جهانی شهر تاریخی یزد.
پایگاه میراث جهانی شهر تاریخی یزد (۱۴۰۱). گزارش ارزیابی و سنجش وضعیت عرصه میراث جهانی شهر تاریخی یزد [گزارش پژوهشی].
پایگاه میراث جهانی شهر تاریخی یزد (۱۴۰۳). ارزیابی تداوم زندگی اجتماعی شهر تاریخی یزد پس از ثبت جهانی [گزارش پژوهشی].
پایگاه میراث جهانی شهر تاریخی یزد (۱۳۹۹). گزارش ادواری پایش شهر تاریخی یزد در دوره سه‌ساله پس از ثبت جهانی [گزارش پژوهشی].
پوربهادر، پوپک و فدائی‌نژاد برامجردی، سمیه (۱۳۹۷). بازشناسی چارچوب نظری رویکرد حفاظتی منظر شهری تاریخ. شهر ایرانی–اسلامی، ۳۱، ۶۳–۷۴.
تاج‌بخش، مونا و پاکزاد، جهانشاه (۱۳۹۵). درآمدی بر فهم اعیان‌سازی و پیامدهای ناخوشایند آن. صفّه، ۲۶(75)، ۷۹–۹۸. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1395.26.4.5.4
تیمورتاش، سارا؛ حناچی، پیروز؛ طالبیان، محمدحسن و سرزعیم، علی (۱۴۰۲). ارزیابی اقتصادی اثرات ثبت جهانی بر توسعه گردشگری: مقایسه موردی یزد و همدان. هنرهای زیبا: معماری و شهرسازی، ۲۸، ۵–۱۴. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2023.322019.672817
جاودان، مجتبی؛ قاسمی، مسلم و ریاضی، آرزو (۱۳۹۸). تحلیلی بر چرخه حیات اجتماعی در مقصدهای گردشگری فرهنگی (مطالعه موردی: شهر ماسوله). برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، ۳، ۱۴۱–۱۶۷.  https://doi.org/10.22080/jtpd.2020.16482.3054
خرم‌روئی، ریحانه؛ پهلوان، پرتو؛ ظریف‌عسگری، الهه و صبوری، سمیه (۱۳۹۹). گرگان از منظر میراث و آیین. فصلنامه هنر و تمدن شرق، ۸(۲۸)، ۱۳-۲۲.  https://doi.org/10.22034/jaco.2020.218052.1142
شلد، سوزان؛ تاپلین، دانا و لو، ستا (۱۳۹۰). نگرشی نو بر تنوع فرهنگی در فضاهای عمومی با تأکید بر پارک‌های شهری. ترجمه واراز مرادی مسیحی، نازیلا رشیدپور، و علی ذوقی. سازمان فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات شهرداری تهران.
عظیمی، شراره و پرتوی، پروین (۱۳۹۹). پدیدارشناسی تجربه‌زیسته ساکنان بافت تاریخی شهر یزد در مواجهه با گردشگری. نامه معماری و شهرسازی، ۱۳(۲۹)، ۵–۳۲.  https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2020.2299.1454
فاضلی، نعمت‌اله (۱۳۹۹). کلان‌شهر و فرهنگ؛ جستارهای انسان‌شناختی دربارۀ پژوهش شهری، فرهنگ و سیاست شهری. نشر فرهامه.
کریس، ژروم و دی‌سنا، جودیت (۱۴۰۰). اعیانی‌سازی در جای‌جای جهان: اعیان‌سازان و آواره‌شدگان. ترجمه آیدین ترکمه و آرش ترکمه. همشهری.
محسنی، ملیحه و زمانی‌فرد، علی (۱۳۹۸). رهیافتی بر خوانش روابط اجتماعی در بافت تاریخی (بررسی موردی: گذر تاریخی آقابزرگ کاشان). نامه معماری و شهرسازی، ۱۱(۲۲)، ۷۱–۹۰.  https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2019.690
فلامکی، محمدمنصور (۱۳۸۴). حریم‌گذاری بر ثروت‌های فرهنگی ایران. (چاپ اول، جلد ۱). نشر فضا.
محمودی‌قوژدی، محمدرضا؛ طالبیان، محمدحسن و وطن‌دوست، رسول (۱۴۰۱). تبیین شکاف‌ها و عدم تعادل‌های فهرست میراث جهانی ایران. نامه معماری و شهرسازی، ۱۵(۳۷)، ۱۲۱–۱۴۵. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2022.3988.1874
یزدگرد، فاطمه؛ حناچی، پیروز؛ و طالبیان، محمدحسن. (۱۴۰۰). مدل ارزیابی وضعیت حفاظت محوطه‌های میراث فرهنگی جهانی (نمونه‌ مطالعه: عرصه ثبت جهانی شهر تاریخی یزد). نقش جهان، ۱۱(۳۴)، ۱۰۱–۱۱۹. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1400.11.2.6.1
Abbas, H. (2019). Heritage and urban change in historic cities. Routledge.
Altman, I., & Low, S. (Eds.). (1992). Place attachment. Plenum Press.
Ashworth, G. J., Graham, B., & Tunbridge, J. E. (2007). Pluralising pasts: Heritage, identity and place. Pluto Press.
Bandarin, F., & van Oers, R. (2012). The historic urban landscape: Managing heritage in an urban century. Wiley-Blackwell.
Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. Polity Press.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Farahani, L. M., & Lozanovska, M. (2015). The social life of historical neighbourhoods: Case study of a Middle Eastern city, Shiraz. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 39(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2015.1088416
Harvey, D. C. (2001). Heritage pasts and heritage presents: Temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. Routledge.
Holtorf, C., & Fairclough, G. (2013). The new heritage: Critical perspectives on cultural heritage. Routledge.
International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). (1987). Charter for the conservation of historic towns and urban areas (Washington Charter 1987). ICOMOS.
Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Pereira Roders, A., & van Wesemael, P. (2020). State-of-the-practice: Assessing community participation within Chinese cultural World Heritage properties. Habitat International, 96, 102107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102107
Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
Parga Dans, E., & Alonso González, P. (2018). The Altamira controversy: Assessing the economic impact of a World Heritage Site for planning and tourism management. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 30, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.10.011
Petrić, L., Hell, M., & van der Borg, J. (2020). Process orientation of the World Heritage City management system. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 46, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.08.006
Pendlebury, J. (2013). Conservation in the age of crisis: Historic cities and contemporary policies. Routledge.
Rapoport, A. (1990). History and precedent in environmental design. Plenum Press.
Rezaei, N. (2017). Resident perceptions toward tourism impacts in historic center of Yazd, Iran. Tourism Geographies, 19(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2016.1144008
Richards, G. (2018). Cultural tourism: A review of recent research and trends. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 36, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.03.005
Stjernström, O., Pashkevich, A., & Avango, D. (2020). Contrasting views on co-management of indigenous natural and cultural heritage: Case of Laponia World Heritage Site, Sweden. Polar Record, 56, e20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247420000225
Smith, L. (2006). The uses of heritage. Routledge.
Tucker, H., & Emge, A. (2010). Managing a World Heritage Site: The case of Cappadocia. Anatolia, 21(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2010.9687096
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. UNESCO.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2011). Recommendation on the historic urban landscape. The General Conference at its 36th session, 10 November 2011. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
World Heritage Centre. (2015). Policy document on World Heritage and sustainable development: Policy document for the integration of a sustainable development perspective into the processes of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO. http://whc.unesco.org/en/documents/1334
World Heritage Centre. (2008). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines
Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002