Investigating the Role of Social Media in Conservation of Tehran Historic Urban Landscape: Values, City Perception and Local Identity Narrative

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Restoration of Historic Buildings and Textures, Faculty of Restoration and Conservation, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Conservation of Historical Monuments, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Conservation of historic urban landscapes in this century requires innovative and forward-thinking approaches that can adapt to the challenges and rapid changes of modern cities. Traditional top-down methods alone are insufficient in effectively safeguarding these invaluable historical sites, necessitating the exploration of new strategies rooted in collective experiences and the creative contributions of diverse groups of people. The Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (2005) explicitly emphasizes the use of cutting-edge technologies, underscoring the importance of digital platforms and, specifically, social media in the conservation of historic urban landscapes. Building upon this notion, the objective of this research is to examine the role and potential of virtual social networks in safeguarding and promoting the historical significance of urban environments. To accomplish this goal, a study was conducted utilizing 12 Instagram pages that focused on the cultural heritage of Tehran. These Instagram accounts were randomly selected as content generators, and web scraping software was employed to extract relevant information over a period of one year. Through a qualitative content analysis, it was found that the various values attributed to the city, instead of being a goal for the protection and management of the city and heritage, can become a means to bring together different groups, experts, citizens as well as locals and tourists. Furthermore, these stakeholders employed various evaluation methods to assess and prioritize a wide spectrum of values associated with the historic urban landscape. In this context, values serve as a unifying force that brings together large and diverse groups, including both experts and local community members, to collectively contribute to the conservation and revitalization of historic urban areas. Consequently, it is evident that authorities and experts would benefit from actively incorporating public participation in both virtual and physical spaces to ensure the sustainable safeguarding of historic urban landscapes. This research highlights the importance of integrating social networks as valuable tools for the conservation and promotion of historic urban landscapes. By examining the content generated on Instagram, it becomes evident that diverse groups of stakeholders play a crucial role in shaping a comprehensive approach to urban preservation. The findings underscore the significance of public participation and the utilization of value assessment methods in ensuring the holistic protection of historic cities. Integrating virtual social networks with real-world engagement allows for a broader range of perspectives and expertise, fostering an inclusive approach to safeguarding and celebrating the historical significance of urban areas. By embracing innovative and inclusive approaches, which effectively harness the power of social media, policymakers and experts can devise more resilient strategies for preserving and promoting the historical essence of urban landscapes. Given the proliferation of online social media and the explicit proposal of the Historic Urban Landscape Recommendation and the high potential of these networks, this issue has a great importance for the conservation and management of historic cities. This research contributes to the understanding of the role of social media in heritage conservation, underscoring the importance of collective participation and engagement in shaping the future of historic urban environments. Through this collaborative effort, the protection and appreciation of historic urban landscapes can be strengthened, ensuring their long-term sustainability and relevance for future generations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

پوربهادر، پوپک، و فدائی‌نژاد بهرامجردی، سمیه (۱۳۹۷). بازشناسی چارچوب نظری رویکرد حفاظتی منظر شهری تاریخی.‎ نشریه مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، ۳۱، ۶۳-۷۴.
تاج‌احمدی‌تبریزی، ‌حنانه، و زمانی‌فرد، علی (۱۴۰۱). رهیافتی بر جایگاه مدیریت تغییر در حفاظت از مناظر شهری تاریخی بررسی موردی: محدوده‌ مرکزی بافت تاریخی قزوین. نامه معماری و شهرسازی، ۱۵(۳۶)، 5-26.‎
تقوایی، سیدحسن، نوروزیان ملکی، سعید، و علیدوست، شایسته (1396). نقش «منظر روزانه» در کیفیت فضاهای شهری مورد پژوهی: مسیر خوابگاه کوی دختران در دانشگاه شهید بهشتی. صفه، ۲۷(۱)، ۵۵-۷۱. 
جعفرپورناصر، ساناز، اسفنجاری‌کناری، عیسی، و طبیبیان، منوچهر (۱۳۹۹). منظر شهری تاریخی و مدیریت تغییر: نقدی تحلیلی از مدل‌های مدیریتی مبتنی‌بر ارزش‌ها.‎ نشریه فرهنگ معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی، ۷ (۱)، ۳۷-۵۴.
طالبیــان، محمــد حســن، و فلاحــت، محمــد صــادق (۱۳88)، منظرهای فرهنگــی: مجموعه مباحث کارگاه کارشناســی ارتقــاء مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی منظرهــای فرهنگــی میــراث جهانــی. مرودشت: بنیــاد پژوهشــی پارســه – پاســارگاد.
عشرتی، پرستو، و  فدائی‌نژاد، سمیه (۱۳۹۷). به سوی رویکردی آرمانی در حفاظت و توسعه‌ی منظر شهری تاریخی. نشریه علمی مرمت و معماری ایران، 8(۱۵)، ۷۵-88.‎
عشرتی، پرستو، و دولابی، پویا (۱۳۹۹). واکاوی منظر شهری تاریخی اصفهان مبتنی بر بنیان‌های فرهنگی و طبیعی از آغاز تا پایان دوران صفوی. معماری و شهرسازی آرمان شهر، 13(33)، ۱۵۳-۱۶۶.‎
عشرتی، پرستو، عشرتی، درنا، و فدائی‌نژاد، سمیه (۱۴۰۰). منظر شهری تاریخی، رویکردی کل‌نگر در حفاظت و توسعه یکپارچه شهری. تهران: سازمان جهاد دانشگاهی تهران.
 
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
Baker, S., & Collins, J. (2016). Popular music heritage, community archives and the challenge of sustainability. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(5), 476–491.
Bandarin, F., & Van Oers, R. (2012). The historic urban landscape managing heritage in an urban century. Chichester [England]: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bandarin, F., & Van Oers, R. (2015). Reconnecting the city. the historic urban landscape approach and the future of urban heritage. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Belenioti, Z., & Vassiliadis, C. A. (2018). Museums & Cultural Heritage via Social Media: An Integrated Literature Review. Tourismos, 12(3), 97–132.
Bradley, E. H, Curry, L. A, Devers, K. J. (2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research, 42, 1758–1772.
Caquard, S. (2013). Cartography I: Mapping narrative cartography. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 135–144.
Caswell, M., & Mallick, S. (2014). Collecting the easily missed stories: Digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American digital archive. Archives and Manuscripts, 42(1), 73–86.
Cauchi-Santoro, R. (2016). Mapping community identity: Safeguarding the memories of a city's downtown core. City, Culture and Society, 7(1), 43–54.
Council of Europe. (2005). Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (Faro Convention). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/culture-and-heritage/faro-convention.
Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social science information, 45(4), 483-499.
Daher, R. F. (2007). Tourism, Heritage, and Urban Transformations in Jordan and Lebanon: Emerging Actors and Global-Local Juxtapositions. In R. F. Daher (Ed.), Tourism in the Middle East: Continuity, change, and transformation (263–307). Clevedon; Buffalo: Channel View Publications.
De Kreek, M., & Van Zoonen, L. (2013). New directions in research on local memory websites. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 113–130.
Dunkel, A. (2015). Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata. Landsc. Urban Plan, 142, 173–186.
Economou, M. (2015). Heritage in the digital age. In: Logan, W., Craith, M.N., Kockel, U. (Eds.) A Companion to Heritage Studies (215–228). John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ.
Fan, L. (2014). International influence and local response: Understanding community involvement in urban heritage conservation in China. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(6), 651–662.
Flinn, A., Stevens, M., & Shepherd, E. (2009). Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival science, 9, 71-86.
Foth, M., Klaebe, H., & Hearn, G. (2008). The role of new media and digital narratives in urban planning and community development. Body, Space and Technology, 7(2), 1-18.
Fredheim, L. H., & Khalaf, M. (2016). The significance of values: heritage value typologies re-examined. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(6), 466–481.
Freeman, C. G. (2018). Participatory Culture and the Social Value of an Architectural Icon: Sydney Opera House. Routledge.
Friedman, T. (2016). The changing political economy of globalization: Multilateral institutions and the 2030 Agenda. Presented at the joint meeting of United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and the Second Committee of the UN General Assembly, United Nations.
Giaccardi, E. (2012). Heritage and Social Media: Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture. Routledge.
Ginzarly, M., & Teller, J. (2018). Operationalizing the HUL Recommendation in Urban River Corridors: Challenges and Perspectives. In A. Pereira Roders & F. Bandarin (Eds.), Reshaping Urban Conservation (Vol. 2, 511–527). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Ginzarly, M., Farah, J., & Teller, J. (2019). Claiming a role for controversies in the framing of local heritage values. Habitat International, 88, 101982.
Girard, L. (2013). Toward a smart sustainable development of port cities/areas: The role of the “Historic Urban Landscape” approach. Sustainability, 5(10), 4329-4348.
Graham, B., & Howard, P. (2008). Heritage and idetity. In B. Graham, & P. Howard (Eds.). The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity (1–15). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Greffe, X. (1998). The economic value of Heritage. University of Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, Paris, France.
Gregory, J. (2015). Connecting with the past through social media: The “Beautiful buildings and cool places Perth has lost” Facebook group. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(1), 22–45.
Halbwachs, M. (1997). La Mémoire collective. Edition critique établie par Gérard Namer, préface de Marie Jaisson. Paris: Albin Michel, p., 132 FF [1er éd. 1950].
Harvey, D. C. (2001). Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7(4), 319–338.
Harvey, W. S., Morris, T., & Müller Santos, M. (2017). Reputation and identity conflict in management consulting. Human relations, 70(1), 92-118.
Haskins, E. V. (2015). Popular memories. commemoration, participatory culture, and democratic citizenship. South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.
Heinich, N. (2017). Des valeurs. Une approche sociologique. Paris: Gallimard.
ICCROM. (2015). Promoting People-Centred Approaches to Conservation: Living Heritage. International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property Via di San Michele, 13 00153 Rome, Italy.
John, N. A. (2013). Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society, 15(2), 167–182.
Kenter, J. O., Raymond, C. M., Van Riper, C. J., Azzopardi, E., Brear, M. R., Calcagni, F., ... & Thankappan, S. (2019). Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability. Sustainability Science, 14, 1439-1461.
Kleymeyer, C. D. (Ed.). (1994). Cultural expression and grassroots development: Cases from Latin America and the Caribbean. USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Lamy, P. (2021). Heritage and renovation center. Municipality of Lyon. https://whc.unesco.org/en/events/1590/.
Lewi, H., Smith, W., Murray, A., & Cooke, S. (2016). Visitor, contributor and conversationalist: Multiple digital identities of the heritage citizen. Historic Environment, 28(2), 12.
Liang, X., Lu, Y., & Martin, J. (2021). A review of the role of social media for the cultural heritage sustainability. Sustainability, 13(3), 1055.
Lopez, B. E., Magliocca, N. R., & Crooks, A. T. (2019). Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media Data for Socio-Environmental Systems Research. Land, 8, 77-98.
Marchiori, E., & Cantoni, L. (2011). The online reputation construct: Does it matter for the tourism domain? A literature review on destinations' online reputation. Information Technology & Tourism, 13(3), 139-159.
Massey, D. (1995). Places and their pasts. History Workshop Journal, 39, 182–192.
Monteiro, V., Painho, M., & Vaz, E. (2015). Is the heritage really important? A theoretical framework for heritage reputation using citizen sensing. Habitat International, 45, 156-162.
Mydland, L., & Grahn, W. (2012). Identifying heritage values in local communities. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(6), 564–587.
Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2008). What drives content tagging: the case of photos on Flickr. In proceeding of the 26th annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, USA. 1097-1100.
O’Donnell, P., & Turner, M. (2012). The Historic Urban Landscape Recommendation: A New UNESCO Tool for a Sustainable Future. IFLA, Cape Town.
Owuor, I., Hochmair, H. H. (2020). An overview of social media apps and their potential role in geospatial research. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9
Paez, D. R., & Liu, J. H. F. (2011). Collective memory of conflicts. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (105–124). Psychology Press.
Paganoni, M. C. (2015). City branding and new media: Linguistic perspectives, discursive strategies and multimodality. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pew Research Center. (2014). While Facebook remains the most popular site, other platforms see higher rates of growth. Washington, DC: Social Media Update; Pew Research Center.
Pickard, R. (2002). A comparative review of policy for the protection of the architectural heritage of Europe. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 8(4), 349-363.
Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., & Runnel, P. (2011). When the museum becomes the message for participating audiences. Communication Management Quarterly, 6(21), 159–179.
Rautenberg, M. (1998). L’émergence patrimoniale de l’ethnologie : entre mémoire et politiques publiques. In Poulot, D (Eds.), Patrimoine et Modernité. Paris L’Harmattan (279–291).
Ripp, M., & Rodwell, D. (2015). The geography of urban heritage. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 6(3), 240-276.
Roued-Cunliffe, H., & Copeland, A. (2017). Participatory heritage. London: Facet Publishing.
Ruths, D.; Pfeffer, J. (2014). Social Media for Large Studies of Behavior. Science, 346, 1063–1064.
Sen, A. (2007). Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny (Reprint edition). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Sigurbjörnsson, B., & van Zwol, R. (2008). Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. In Proceeding of ACM International World Wide Web Conference, New York, USA, ACM, 327-336.
Silberman, N., & Purser, M. (2012). Collective memory as affirmation. People-centered cultural heritage in a digital age. In E. Giaccardi (Ed.). Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture (13–29). New York: Routledge.
Simon, R. I. (2012). Remembering together: Social media and the formation of the historical present. In E. Giaccardi (Ed.). Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture (89–106). New York: Routledge.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. Routledge.
Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006.
Taylor, K. (2016). The Historic Urban Landscape paradigm and cities as cultural landscapes. Challenging orthodoxy in urban conservation. Landscape Research, 41(4), 471–480.
Trant, J. (2009). Studying social tagging and folksonomy: A review and framework. Journal of Digital Information. 10(1).
Tweed, C., & Sutherland, M. (2007). Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(1), 62–69.
UNESCO. (2005). The Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. Paris, France.
UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on The Historic Urban Landscape. Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Center.
UNESCO. (2016a). The Historic Urban Landscape Guidebook: Managing heritage in dynamic and constantly changing urban environments. Retrieved from http://www.hulballarat.org.au/resources/HUL%20Guidebook_2016_FINALWEB.pdf.
UNESCO. (2016b). Culture: urban future: global report on culture for sustainable urban development. Paris, France. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002462/246291E.pdf.
Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. A critical history of social media. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van House, N. A. (2007). Flickr and public image-sharing: distant closeness and photo exhibition. In CHI'07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 2717-2722.
Van Oers, R. (2014). Conclusion: the way forward: an agenda for reconnecting the city. Reconnecting the City: The Historic Urban Landscape Approach and the Future of Urban Heritage, 317-332.
Wilson, K., & Desha, C. (2016). Engaging in design activism and communicating cultural significance through contemporary heritage storytelling: A case study in Brisbane, Australia. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 6(3), 271–286.
Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the Data is Already Public”: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 313–325.
Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning
Volume 16, Issue 42
March 2024
Pages 111-133

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics