Assessment of Design-Effective Low-Carbon Building Criteria in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Architecture and Energy, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Iran is one of top ten CO2 emitting countries in the world and as a signatory of the Paris Agreement, has to reduce 4–8 percent of the overall CO2 emissions by 2030. The building sector is one of the most cost-effective opportunities for CO2 emission reduction. Low-carbon buildings are designed and constructed to emit very little carbon during their lifecycle. This research aims to identify appropriate categories and criteria for assessing low-carbon building in Iran. These criteria were assessed using Delphi technique in multiple rounds. Thus, in this study, 30 Iranian experts were selected based on their experiences in the building construction industry and building sustainability assessment to participate in the Delphi process. The experts were selected from different backgrounds: one-third from consultant companies, one-third from government authorities, and the remaining third from institutions and universities. The “interquartile range” and “Standard Deviation” were selected to measure the consensus and “Mean” was used to assess the importance of each criterion. Ninety-four criteria were classified into seven categories which are location and site, architecture, material and construction, energy efficiency, water efficiency, indoor environmental quality, and renewable energy. The most important criteria are "environmental design" and " improvement of the building envelope". This paper reviews policy, laws, regulations, and standards to understand the implementation platform of important criteria in each category:
Location and site: It is recommended that low-carbon criteria be considered in the future national planning and land master plans.
Architecture: There are regulations such as Code No. 19 (energy efficiency in buildings) and Code No. 4 (General building requirements) of Iranian national building regulations. It is proposed that in the future editions of Code No. 4, low-carbon building criteria such as "rethinking the form and shape of the building and height of stories" and "rethinking zoning and space planning" should be considered.
Material and construction: There is an official policy incentive to the standardization of materials. Code No. 5 of Iranian national building regulations (Materials and building components) has environmental, health, and safety implementation requirements for conventional materials.
Energy efficiency: Code No. 19 of Iranian national building regulations represents rules for the design and implementationof important criteria and there are legal incentives and governmental funds for implementation of Code No. 19.
Water efficiency: There is an official policy incentive for optimization and monitoring of water consumption in different building types.
Indoor environmental quality: It is recommended to compile thermal and visual comfort standards for buildings.
Renewable energy: Iran has a great potential for renewable energy, but it is not economically viable. There are regulations and standards for implementing renewable energy.
The output of this research is identification of low-carbon building criteria and assessment of the importance of each criterion based on the country's context. It would help architects to deliver the low-carbon design and it is useful for policymakers to direct building industry to a low-carbon future.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

دفتر امور مقررات ملی ساختمان (۱۳۹۲). مبحث ۴ مقررات ملی ساختمان ایران. تهران: معاونت امور ساختمان و مسکن، وزارت راه، مسکن و شهرسازی. قابل دسترس در http://www.bhrc.ac.ir
دفتر امور مقررات ملی ساختمان (۱۳۹۲). مبحث ۵ مقررات ملی ساختمان ایران. تهران: معاونت امور ساختمان و مسکن، وزارت راه، مسکن و شهرسازی. قابل دسترس در http://www.bhrc.ac.ir
دفتر امور مقررات ملی ساختمان (۱۳۹۹). مبحث ۱۹ مقررات ملی ساختمان ایران. تهران: معاونت امور ساختمان و مسکن، وزارت راه، مسکن و شهرسازی. قابل دسترس در http://www.bhrc.ac.ir
سازمان برنامه و بودجه (۱۳۹۱). سند ملی محیط‌زیست کشور ایران. تهران: سازمان برنامه و بودجه.
سازمان حفاظت محیط زیست (۱۳۹۴). تصویب‌نامه در خصوص اقدامات مربوط به برنامه مشارکت ملی در زمینه کاهش انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای. سازمان حفاظت محیط زیست. قابل دسترس در http://qavanin.ir/Law
مجلس شورای اسلامی (۱۳۹۵). برنامه ششم توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی پنج‌ساله. مجلس شورای اسلامی. قابل دسترس در https://rc.majlis.ir
معاونت امور برق و انرژی، دفتر برنامه‌ریزی کلان برق و انرژی (۱۳۹۸). ترازنامه انرژی ایران سال ۱۳۹۶. معاونت امور برق و انرژی، دفتر برنامه‌ریزی کلان برق و انرژی. قابل دسترس در http://pep.moe.gov.ir
وزارت نیرو (۱۳۸۸). تصویب‌نامه درخصوص الگوی مصرف آب در مصارف مختلف. وزارت نیرو. قابل دسترس در https://rc.majlis.ir
وزارت نفت و نیرو  (۱۳۹۹): طرح جامع انرژی کشور. وزارت نفت و نیرو. قابل دسترس در http://cabinetoffice.ir
Abergel, T., Dean, B., & Dulac, J. (2017). Towards a zero-emission, efficient, and resilient buildings and construction sector. Global Status Report In UN Environment and International Energy Agency. Paris, France 22.
Akhanova, G., Nadeem, A., Kim, J. R.,  & Azhar, S. (2020): A multi-criteria decision-making framework for building sustainability assessment in Kazakhstan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101842. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101842.
Alawneh, R., Ghazali, F., Ali, H., & Sadullah, A. F. (2019): A Novel framework for integrating United Nations Sustainable Development Goals into sustainable non-residential building assessment and management in Jordan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49, 101612. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101612.
Aldossary, N. A., Rezgui, Y., & Kwan, A. (2015). Consensus-based low carbon domestic design framework for sustainable homes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 417–432. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.070.
Alyami, S. H. (2019). Critical Analysis of Energy Efficiency Assessment by International Green Building Rating Tools and Its Effects on Local Adaptation. Arab J Sci Eng, 44(10), 8599–8613. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-019-03972-x.
Jackson, R. (2019).  The Global Carbon Project.  Retrieved 10 May, 2019 from  http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org
Baba, A. (2013). Developing a decision support framework for low carbon housing design and delivery in the UK. University of the West of England.
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling. Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological methods & research, 10(2), 141–163.
Boake, T. M. (2008): The Leap to Zero Carbon and Zero Emissions. Understanding How to Go Beyond Existing Sustainable Design Protocols. Journal of Green Building, 3(4), 64–77. DOI: 10.3992/jgb.3.4.64.
Byrne, J., Taylor, M., Ambrose, M., Berry, S., & Sproul, A. (2019). Guide to low carbon residential buildings—new build. Sydney, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Low Carbon Living.
CaGBC (2020). Zero Carbon Building, design standard. version 2. Canada: Canada Green Building Council.
Chan, A. P. C., Yung, E. H. K., Lam, P. T. I., Tam, C. M., & Cheung, S. O. (2010). Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 19(7), 699–718. DOI: 10.1080/01446190110066128.
Cho, S, & Chae, C. (2016). A study on life cycle CO2 emissions of low-carbon building in South Korea. Sustainability, 8(6), 579.
Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi. A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373–386.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98.
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management science, 9(3), 458–467.
Dawood, S., Crosbie, T., Dawood, N., & Lord, R. (2013). Designing low carbon buildings. A framework to reduce energy consumption and embed the use of renewables. Sustainable Cities and Society, 8, 63–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.005.
Fenner, A. E., Kibert, C. J., Woo, J., Morque, S., Razkenari, M., Hakim, H., & Lu, X. (2018). The carbon footprint of buildings. A review of methodologies and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 1142–1152. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.012.
Frank, O.L., Omer, S. A., Riffat, S. B., & Mempouo, B. (2015). The indispensability of good operation & maintenance (O&M) manuals in the operation and maintenance of low carbon buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 14, e1-e9.
Fthenakis, V. M. (2000). End-of-life management and recycling of PV modules. Energy Policy, 28(14), 1051–1058. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00091-4.
Gracht, H. A. (2012): Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525–1536. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013.
Herrero-Garcia, V. (2014). Minimizing carbon offset purchase. A framework for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the building sector. Philadelphia University.
Hildebrand, L. (2014). Strategic investment of embodied energy during the architectural planning process. tu delft.
Hill, R. C., & Bowen, P. A. (1997). Sustainable construction. Principles and a framework for attainment. Construction Management and Economics, 15(3), 223–239. DOI: 10.1080/014461997372971.
IEA (2012). CO2 emissions from Fuel Combustion. International Energy Agency, 13, 2895–2902.
IFC (2020). EDGE Buildings. Available online at https://edgebuildings.com/, updated on 2020-11-12T15:57:47Z, checked on 3/28/2021.192Z.
Jones, P. (2009). Low Carbon Building Design. European Experience [J]. Architecture Technique, 12, 25.
Kamaruzzaman, S. N., Lou, E. C. W., Wong, P. F., Edwards, R., Hamzah, N., & Ghani, M. K.(2019). Development of a non-domestic building refurbishment scheme for Malaysia. A Delphi approach. Energy, 167, 804–818. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.020.
Kang, H., Lee, Y., & Kim, S. (2016). Sustainable building assessment tool for project decision makers and its development process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 58, 34–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.003.
La Roche, P. (2017). Carbon-neutral architectural design. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Linstone, H., & Turoff, M. (1975a). The delphi method. Addison-Wesley Reading, Massachusetts.
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M.  (1975). The delphi method. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 3-12.
Looman, R. (2017). Climate-responsive design. A framework for an energy concept design-decision support tool for architects using principles of climate-responsive design. PhD  dissertation. TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment
Luo, T., Tan, Y., Langston, C., & Xue, X. (2019). Mapping the knowledge roadmap of low carbon building. A scientometric analysis. Energy and Buildings, 194, 163-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.03.050.
Manoliadis, O., Tsolas, I., & Nakou, A. (2006). Sustainable construction and drivers of change in Greece. A Delphi study. Construction Management and Economics, 24(2), 113–120. DOI: 10.1080/01446190500204804.
OECD (2017). CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2017. OECD Publishing.
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool. An example, design considerations and applications. Information & management, 42(1), 15–29.
Pan, W., & Pan, M. (2018). A dialectical system framework of zero carbon emission building policy for high-rise high-density cities: Perspectives from Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 1-13.
Pomponi, F., Moncaster, A., & Wolf, C. (2018). Furthering embodied carbon assessment in practice. Results of an industry-academia collaborative research project. Energy and Buildings, 167, 177–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.052.
Roufechaei, K. M., Hassan Abu Bakar, A. & Tabassi, A. A. (2014). Energy-efficient design for sustainable housing development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 380–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.015.
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool. Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7.
Sattary, S. (2017). Potential Carbon Emission Reductions (PCER) in Australian Construction Systems through the Use of Bioclimatic Design Principles. University of Southern Queensland.
Shi, Q., Yu, T., & Zuo, J. (2015). What leads to low-carbon buildings? A China study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 726–734. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.037.
Shields, T. J., Silcock, G. W. H., Donegan, H. A., & Bell, Y. A. (1987). Methodological problems associated with the Use of the Delphi technique. Fire Technol, 23(3), 175–185. DOI: 10.1007/BF01036934.
Tiwari, R. (2015). A Decision-Support Framework for Design of Non-Residential Net-Zero Energy Buildings. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Torcellini, P., Pless, S., Deru, M., & Crawley, D. (2006). Zero energy buildings. A critical look at the definition. National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Department of Energy, US.
UKGBC (2019). Net Zero Carbon Buildings. UK Green Building Council.
UNEP (2009). Common Carbon Metric for Measuring Energy Use & Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Building Operations. In United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (500), 1000.
UNFCCC (2015). The Paris Agreement. Retrieved 06 April, 2019 from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement
USGBC Organization (2020). LEED Zero Program Guide. Retrieved 15 July, 2020 from https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-zero-program-guide.
Witkin, B. R., & Altschuld, J. W. (1995). Planning and conducting needs assessments. A practical guide: Sage.
Yang, Y., Li, B., & Yao, R. (2010). A method of identifying and weighting indicators of energy efficiency assessment in Chinese residential buildings. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7687–7697. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.018.
Zapata Poveda, M. G. (2014). An investigation of the tools and situated learning in non-domestic low carbon building design. Cardiff University.
Zarghami, E., Fatourehchi, D., & Karamloo, M. (2019). Establishing a region-based rating system for multi-family residential buildings in Iran. A holistic approach to sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101631. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101631.
Zhou, Y., Clarke, L., Eom, J., Kyle, P., Patel, P., & Kim, S. H. (2014). Modeling the effect of climate change on US state-level buildings energy demands in an integrated assessment framework. Applied Energy, 113, 1077–1088.
 
Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning
Volume 16, Issue 40
September 2023
Pages 5-25

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics