Identification and Capacity Assessment of Managerial Actors of Urban Regeneration and Renewal at National and Local Level (City of Tehran) and Analysis of Their Correlation Network

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Research Center for Historical-Cultural Buildings and Fabrics, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran, Iran

4 M.A. in Urban Planning, Faculty of Arts, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Studies in the field of regeneration management in Iran show that despite the efforts and planning, so far, the process of urban renovation and regeneration in the national level and especially in Tehran has not been carried out with the participation of all actors and stakeholders. However, in recent years, with the formation of the Tehran Metropolitan Reconstruction Headquarter, a concerted effort has been made to achieve inter-organizational coordination, both within the municipality and with related institutions outside the municipality. In spite of these joint actions, there are still political and functional Fragmentation among these actors. Each of these actors has specific powers according to their organizational duties and has access to the necessary resources in this field. However, the inconsistency between their actions and sometimes the overlap of tasks between them and the lack of a clear institutional plan are among the causes that have led to a lack of organizational coordination, thus, the failure to achieve the desired goal. Therefore, the lack of integrated and coordinated management and its support mechanisms in the field of urban renovation and regeneration has caused the renovation process to have a significant distance from the goals of the country's macro-plans. Although the formation of a National Urban Regeneration Headquarter can provide some coordination between different organizations at different national and urban levels, it cannot achieve its main goals without a coherent plan that considers the various tasks of the different institutions in coordination with each other. The purpose of this study is to identify the actors of regeneration and renovation management at the national and local level (Tehran metropolis) as well as the pattern of its current relationships and ultimately the capacity assessment of key actors in this field. Thus, this is an applied research using a mixed method. In order to achieve the objectives of the research, in addition to examining the theoretical foundations of the subject, various documents such as bylaws and memorandum and records of the Tehran Renovation Organization were analyzed. Finally, to increase the reliability and validity of the research and complete the data, the method of interviewing experts and top managers of the involved organizations has been used. Findings show that the number of actors in this field is very high, but in practice it is dominated by the governmental and public sectors (municipalities) while the private sector and local communities have a small role in the structure of regeneration management. In this case, the actors generally follow their specified organizational missions and systematically prefer the interests of the organization to the issue of regeneration. In terms of communication, certain centers are recognizable and vertical connections between institutions are not noticeable. The study also shows that these actors have significant capacities, which have a great potential for policy and management of urban regeneration.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • اردستانی، زهرالسادات (1394). تبیین الگوی بومی بازآفرینی شهری به منظور احیای بافت‌های فرسوده. رساله دکتری شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
  • ایزدی، محمد سعید (1390). گزارش ملی بهسازی مناطق نابسامان شهری. هفت‏شهر، 35، 65-84.
  • حاجی علی‌اکبری، کاوه (1394). مستندسازی تجربه راه‌اندازی دفاتر محلی نوسازی بافت فرسوده در شهر تهران. تهران: شرکت عمران و بهسازی شهری ایران (مادر تخصصی).
  • روستا، مجید (1391). تبیین جایگاه نهادها در نوسازی بافت‌های فرسوده شهری. تهران: سازمان نوسازی شهر تهران.
  • سعید نیا، احمد (1379). مدیریت شهری، کتاب سبز شهرداری (جلد 11). تهران: انتشارات سازمان شهرداری‌ها.
  • عزیزی، محمدمهدی، ابویی اردکان، محمد، نوری، نسرین (1390). بررسی نقش کنشگران و ابزارهای مدیریت شهری در یکپارچگی مدیریت کلانشهر تهران. نشریه هویت شهر، 10، ۵-۱۶.
  • فیروزی، محمدعلی، امان‌پور، سعید، زارعی، جواد (1397). تحلیل مناسبات میان نهادی در مدیریت بازآفرینی شهری پایدار بافت‌های فرسوده، نمونه موردی، کلانشهر اهواز. فصلنامه مطالعات شهری، 29، ۱۹-۳۰.
  • قالیباف، محمدباقر، حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا، محمدپور، علی (1392). نقش تقسیمات شهر در مدیریت یکپارچه شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهر تهران). نشریه جغرافیا، 37، ۴۷-۶۹.
  • کلانتری خلیل‌آباد، حسین، پوراحمد، احمد، موسوی، سید رفیع، شیری‌پور، مهدی (1396). چالش‌های نهادی در بازآفرینی پایدار شهری. نشریه هفت شهر، ۴۷-۴۸، ۱۱۲-۱۲۱.
  • نخعی، مهدیه، بندریان، اسفندیار، پناهی، عزت (1398). بررسی نقش کنشگران دخیل در فرایند نوسازی بافت‌های فرسوده شهری (منطقه 12 تهران)، فصلنامه فضای جغرافیایی، 68، ۲۷-۵۸.
  • هودسنی، هانیه (1394). مدیریت بازآفرینی شهری با تاکید بر فرآیندهای حکمروایی محلی؛ نمونه موردی: شهر تهران. رساله دکتری شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
  • هیلیر، جین (1388). سایه‌های قدرت، حکایت دوراندیشی برنامه‌ریزی کاربری اراضی (مترجم: کمال پولادی). تهران: جامعه مهندسان مشاور ایران.

 

  • Andrew, C., Goldsmith, M. (1998). From Local Government to Local Governance and Beyond. International Political Sciences Review,19 ,101-117 .
  • Atkinson, R. & Moon, G. (1994). Urban Policy in Britain: The City, the State and the Market. London: Macmillan.
  • Burby, R. J. (2003). Making Plans that Matter- Citizen Involvement and Government Action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33-49.
  • Couch, C., Sykes, O. & Borstinghaus, W. (2011). Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency. Progress in Planning, 75, 1–52.
  • Department for Business enterprise regulatory Reform (2007). Retrived from: www.gov.uk/government/publications/ Department for Business enterprise regulatory Reform, 2007.
  • Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (2nd Edition). London: Macmillan.
  • Hudson, R. (2004). Conceptualizing economies and their geographies: Spaces, Flows and Circuits. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 447-471.
  • Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (2003). The Impact of Collaborative Planning on Governance Capacity, IURD Working Paper Series. UC Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
  • Innes, J.E. & Booher, D.E. (2004). Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5(4), 419-436.
  • Karaman, O., (2013). Urban renewal in Istanbul: Reconfigured spaces, robotic lives. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 715-733.
  • Lane, M. B., & Robinson C. J. (2009). Institutional complexity and environmental management: the challenge of integration and the promise of large-scale collaboration. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 16, 27-35.
  • Mackintosh, M. (1992). Partnership: Issues of Policy and Negotiation. Local Economy, 7 (3), 210- 224.
  • McCarthy, J. (2007). Partnership, Collaborative Planning, and Urban Regeneration. London: Ashgate.
  • Medhurst, F. & Lewis, J. P. (1968). Urban Decay: An Analysis and a Policy. London: macmillan.
  • Noon, D., Smith-Canham, J., Eagland, M. (2000). Economic Regeneration and Funding, In: P. Roberts and H. Sykes (eds.), Urban Regeneration: A Handbook (61-85). London: SAGE Publications.
  • Stocker, G. (1998). Governance as Theory: Five Propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17-28.
  • Verhage, R. (2005). Renewing urban renewal in France, the UK and the Netherlands: Introduction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(3) , 215-227 .
  • Vinci, I. (2002) Local governance, urban regeneration and planning project in Italy: The process of internationalization in the city of Palermo. Paper presented at the Eura Conference, Turin, April 2002.
  • Yang, Y. R., Chang, C., (2007). An Urban Regeneration Regime in China: A Case Study of Urban Redevelopment in Shanghai’s Taipingqiao Area. Urban Studies, 44(9), 1809-1826.