-- اسدپور، علی، مظفر، فرهنگ، فیضی، محسن، و بهزادفر، مصطفی (1395). کاربست شاخص‌های ادارک اجتماعی در بازآفرینی منظر رودخانه شهری (نمونه موردی رودخانه خشک شیراز). علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 18(3)، 395-417.
-- برق جلوه، شهیندخت، مدقالچی، نیکو، و مبرقعی دینان، نغمه (1392). ارزیابی عملکرد بوم شناختی دالان روددره شهری (تهران دالان روددره درکه). پژوهش‌های محیط زیست، 4، 91-104.
-- برق جلوه، شهیندخت، و مبرقعی دینان، نغمه (1392). توسعه شاخص‌های پایداری شبکه سبزراه ها بر اساس اصول بوم شناسی سیمای سرزمین. فصلنامه علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 15، 51-68.
-- برنجی، شادی، و براتی، شینا (1390). شهر و بوم؛ عیان‌سازی زیرساخت های طبیعی، راهبرد توسعه بوم شناسی شهر. مجله منظر، 16، 64-67.
-- بریس، نیکلا، کمپ، ریچارد، و سنلگر، رمزی (1393). تحلیل داده‌های روان‌شناسی با برنامه SPSS (ویرایش سوم). تهران: نشر دوران.
- سرمد، زهره، بازرگان، عباس، و حجازی، الهه (1392). روش‌های تحقیق در علوم رفتاری. تهران: آگاه.
- Ahern, J., Cilliers, S., & Niemela, J. (2014). The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 254–259.
- Asakawa, S., Yoshida, K., & Yabe, K. (2004). Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system of Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and urban planning, 68(2), 167-182.
-- Beately, T. (2011). Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature Into Urban Design and Planning. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
-- Charles, C., & Louv, R. (2009). Children’s nature deficit: What we know and don’t know. Children and Nature Network, 1-32.
-- Clark, N. E., Lovell, R., Wheeler, B. W., Higgins, S. L., Depledge, M. H., & Norris, K. (2014). Biodiversity, cultural pathways, and human health: a framework. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29(4), 198–204.
-- Cox, D. T., Hudson, H. L., Shanahan, D. F., Fuller, R. A., & Gaston, K. J. (2017). The rarity of direct experiences of nature in an urban population. Landscape and Urban Planning, 160, 79-84.
-- De Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural environments—healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and planning, 35(10), 1717-1731.
-- Dronova, I. (2017). Environmental heterogeneity as a bridge between ecosystem service and visual quality objectives in management, planning and design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 163, 90–106.
-- Frank, S., Fürst, C., Koschke, L., & Makeschin, F. (2012). A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 21, 30-38.
-- Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Ode, A., & Velarde, M. D. (2009). The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicatores. Ecological indicators, 9, 933-947.
-- Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. (2007). The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape ecology, 22(7), 959-972.
-- Gunnarsson, B., Knez, I., Hedblom, M., & ode, A. (2016). Effects of biodiversity and environment-related attitude on perception of urban green space. Urban Ecosystems, 20(1), 1-13.
-- Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. AnnualReview of Public Health, 35, 207–228.
-- Junge, x., Jacot, K. A., Bosshard, A., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2009). Swiss people's attitudes towards field margins for biodiversity conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 17(3), 150-159.
-- Junge, X., Schuepbach, B., Walter, T., Schmid, B., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2015). Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonalstages in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 67–77.
-- Kuchler-Krischun, J., Nurnberg, M., Schell, C., Erdmann, K., & Mues, A. W. (2016). Indicator for public awareness of biodiversity. Federal agency for nature conservation, BFN. Berlin: Federal Ministry for Environmrnt, Nature conservation, Bilding and Nuclear Safety.
-- Leitao, A. B., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and urban planning, 59, 65-93.
-- Lerman, S. B., & Warren, P. S. (2011). The conservation value of residential yards: linking birds and people. Ecological applications, 21(4), 1327-1339.
-- Lin, B. B., Gaston, K. J., Fuller, R. A., Wu, D., Bush, R., & Shanahan, D. F. (2017). How green is your garden?: Urban form and socio-demographic factors influence yard vegetation, visitation, and ecosystem service benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 239-246.
-- Lindemann-Matthies, P., Junge, X., & Matthies, D. (2010). The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biological Conservation, 143(1), 195-202.
-- McCurdy, L. E., Winterbottom, K. E., Mehta, S. S., & Roberts, J. R. (2010). Using nature and outdoor activity to improve children's health. Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care, 40(5), 102-117.
-- Nassauer, J. I. (2012). Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106, 221–229.
-- Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740.
-- Ode, A., & Miller, D. (2011). Analysing the relationship between indicators of landscape complexity and preference. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 38(1), 24–40.
-- Oliveira, S., Andrade, H., & Vaz, T. (2011). The cooling effect of green spaces as a contribution to the mitigation of urban heat: A case study in Lisbon. Building and Environment, 46(11), 2186-2194.
-- Pett, T. J., Shwartz, A., Irvine, K. N., Dallimer, M., & Davies, Z. G. (2016). Unpacking the People–Biodiversity Paradox: A Conceptual Framework. BioScience, 66(7), 576-583.
-- Phillips, P. (1998). Intelligible Images: The Dynamics of Disclosure. Landscape Journal, 17(special issue), 108-117.
-- Priego, C., Breuste, J. H., & Rojas, J. (2008). Perception and value of nature in urban landscapes: a comparative analysis of cities in Germany, Chile and Spain. Landscape Online, 7, 1-22.
-- Purcell, A. T., & Lamb, R. J. (1998). Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42, 57-66.
-- Sang, A. O., Knez, I., Gunnarsson, B., & Hedblom, M. (2016). The effects of naturalness, gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 18, 268-276.
-- Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(3), 289-297.
-- Schuepbach, B., Junge, X., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2016). Seasonality,diversity and aesthetic valuation of landscape plots: An integrative approachto assess landscape quality on different scales. Land Use Policy, 53, 27–35.
-- Shwartz, A., Turbé, A., Laurent, S., & Julliard, R. (2014). Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: An experiment. Biological Conservation, 171, 82-90.
-- Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: The loss of human-natureinteractions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94–101.
-- Soga, M., Gaston, K. J., Koyanagi, T. F., Kurisu, K., & Hanaki, K. (2016). Urban residents' perceptions of neighbourhood nature: Does the extinction of experience matter? Biological Conservation, 203, 143-150.
-- Soga, M., Yuichi, Y., Aikoh, T., Shoji, Y., Kubo, T., & Gaston, K. (2015). Reducing the extinction of experence: assossiation between urban form and recreational use of public greenspace. Landscape and urban planning, 143, 69-75.
-- Sowi´nska-´Swierkosz, B. N. (2016). Index of Landscape Disharmony (ILDH) as a newtool combining the aesthetic and ecological approach to landscape assessment. Ecological Indicators, 70, 166–180.
-- Sowi´nska-´Swierkosz, B., & Chmielewski, T. J. (2016). A new approach of theidentification of landscape quality objectives (LQOs) as a set of indicators. Journal of Environmental Management, 184, 596–608.
-- Steinitz, C. (1990). Toward a sustainable landscape with high visual preference and high ecological integrity: the loop road in Acadia National Park, USA. Landscape and urban planning, 19(3), 213-250.
-- Syrbe, R. U., & Walz, U. (2012). Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological indicators, 21, 80-88.
-- Turner, F. (1998). A Cracked Case. Landscape journal, 17(special issue), 130-138.
-- Tveit, M. S., & Ode, A. (2014). Landscape assessment in metropolitan areas –developing a visual indicator based approach. SPOOL.
-- van Riper, C. J., Kyle, G. T., Sherrouse, B. C., Bagstad, K. J., & Sutton, S. G. (2017). Toward an integrated understanding of perceived biodiversity values and environmental conditions in a national park. Ecological Indicators, 72, 278-287.
-- Wu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape ecology, 28, 999-1023.
-- Zheng, B., Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2011). Preference to home landscape: wildness or neatness? Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(1), 1-8.
)