The role of rain in the multisensory experience of vernacular architecture in Rasht: A qualitative content analysis of tourists’ experiences

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Tourism, Faculty of Humanities, Science and Arts university, Yazd, Iran

2 PhD Candidate in Tourism, Department of Tourism, Faculty of Humanities, University of Science and Arts, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

Seeing isn’t everything when visiting cities shaped by constant weather patterns. Instead of occasional shifts, some places live under steady atmospheric influence - this changes how people move, feel, not just look around. Take Rasht: northern Iran’s rainy hub, where old building styles grew out of damp surroundings. There, travel moments involve touch, sound, even smell - not only sight. Yet most studies on tourism fixate on landmarks, ignoring wetness as anything more than an obstacle. Architecture writings too often skip how moisture interacts with design to shape feeling. Here lies the focus: rainfall, working alongside local structures, helps form deeper visitor encounters rooted in body awareness, mood, heritage.
What stood out first was how deeply personal each story felt. Instead of counting numbers, the work focused on understanding what traveling to Rasht truly meant for those who had been there multiple times. People joined after being selected deliberately - only if they’d visited more than once. Their accounts carried weight because time spent shaped their views. Some were young, others older; jobs varied widely, as did where they lived when not in Rasht. A total of nineteen voices made up the group. One thing kept guiding decisions: stopping only when nothing fresh emerged anymore. Repetition signaled depth, not redundancy. By then, recurring themes ran clearly through every last interview. Each interview ran up to an hour and a quarter, unfolding through open-ended questions about how people sense rain, move within rainy environments, experience built forms during downpours, and attach social significance to wet weather. Transcripts were made of every session, ensuring spoken words stayed intact for analysis. Alongside these texts, observations taken during meetings helped preserve nuances like mood shifts or gestures tied to specific moments. Insights emerged gradually, shaped by pauses, emphasis, and background details noted at the time.
Beginning with careful readings, data work unfolded through reflexive thematic methods focused on meaning, not just how often things appeared. From transcripts, 237 distinct codes emerged by hand, shaped slowly across repeated passes. Grouping these revealed early patterns, later fine-tuned into broader themes via ongoing contrast and thoughtfulness. Instead of standing alone, human judgment guided each stage, while small-scale digital checks - like term emphasis and group consistency - offered quiet backing without steering conclusions.
A closer look uncovered three linked ideas shaping how visitors engage with Rasht when it rains. Rain, rather than just weather, became something felt through multiple senses at once. Sounds stood out - drops hitting wood and stone made repeating patterns some found soothing. Smells also played a role: damp earth and greenery gave the air a distinct character. People noticed moisture against their skin, subtle yet persistent. Light changed too, bouncing off wet surfaces, blurring edges, wrapping streets in haze. Together, these details pulled individuals into quieter, more reflective moments. Movement slowed, and attention gradually shifted inward toward personal reflection and heightened sensory awareness. The city felt less like a place to pass through, more like one to inhabit deeply.
Despite the downpour, people kept moving through the city thanks to design choices rooted in local tradition. Sloping rooftops often appeared, guiding water away while creating space underneath for walking. Extended eaves stretched outward, shielding pathways without blocking views or sounds of falling rain. Verandas and covered walkways showed up repeatedly, acting like buffers between inside and outside worlds. Instead of hiding from wet weather, visitors stayed engaged - seeing, hearing, feeling the storm at arm’s length. Sheltered yet exposed, they remained part of the moment rather than removed from it. Rain became something handled quietly by structure, not fought against. Movement did not stop; rhythm continued. Comfort emerged not from staying dry alone - but from being able to stay present.
One way people saw rain was through culture, tying it closely to who they are and where they belong. Not just weather - rain stood out as something that defined Rasht for those involved. Memories formed around wet days; stories grew from damp streets. It marked belonging, shaped how journeys were recalled. Life in the north carried rhythm, linked to falling drops, seen as part of daily living. Thoughts about fresh beginnings, steady cycles, balance with surroundings - all surfaced when discussing rainfall. This connection deepened ties to the location, made visits stick in mind longer. Feelings for the city strengthened because of such moments. More than climate data, rain turned into shared symbol - lived in minds, repeated in tales. Meaning built up over time gave it weight beyond forecast reports.
Layered experiences emerge when sight, touch, and memory interact within built spaces shaped by tradition. Although rain often carries negative associations, thoughtful design turns it into a meaningful part of place identity. Instead of treating weather as a constraint, local building methods show how environments become more vivid through seasonal rhythms. This research adds depth to tourism studies by focusing on bodily engagement, not just visual appeal. Rather than generic solutions, heritage structures provide clues about living well in wet climates. Urban designers might look closely at such examples when shaping places where culture, comfort, and context align naturally.
The study makes an additional contribution to the body of research by transforming the concept of climate in urban tourism research as an experiential asset instead of a background condition. By using the concept of rain in a relational way with atmosphere, architecture, and the body, the study shows how constancy in the environment, instead of monotony, can cultivate depth. In the case of Rasht, and in the case of other places with the same condition, the design, in a culturally appropriate way, and unchanging climatic conditions, can create a feeling of familiarity, anticipation, and emotional layering, even in a place where the weather changes from one visit to another. All of this clarifies the role of multisensory in place designing and in urban tourism. Finally, the study places vernacular design as an adaptive system, rather than as a heritage to be preserved.

Keywords

Main Subjects


امان‌پور، مریم (۱۴۰۰). پدیدارشناسی معماری ادراکات چند‌حسی در اندیشه‌های یوهانی پالاسما. نشریه معماری سبز، ۵(۲۷)، 1-8.
امیرکیایی، سیدمهدی؛ مفیدی شمیرانی، سیدمجید؛ مهدوی‌نژاد، محمدجواد و رئیس‌سمیعی، محمدمهدی (۱۳۹۸). بررسی میزان تطابق اصول واسازی با معماری بومی روستایی گیلان. مطالعات برنامهریزی سکونتگاههای انسانی (چشمانداز جغرافیایی)، ۱۴(۲)، ۳۷۷-۳۹۳. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jshsp/Article/1031601
قلی‌زاده، منیژه؛ حافظ رضازاده، معصومه و رضا انوری، محمود (۱۴۰۱). معماری سبز: هماهنگی و سازگاری با محیط زیست (نمونه موردی شهر رشت). مطالعات هنر اسلامی، ۱۹(۴۵)، ۵۳۹-۵۵۹. https://doi.org/10.22034/ias.2020.248710.1353
مجلسی، بهار؛ خاکپور، مژگان و ترکاشوند، عباس (۱۴۰۲). پژوهشی در نقش تجربه‌ی چند‌حسی در حضورپذیری فضاها با استفاده از روش‌های علوم اعصاب. معماری و شهرسازی ایران، ۱۴(۲)، ۵۹-۷۹. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2023.321713.1838
مولایی، اصغر. (۱۴۰۰). بازشناسی ابعاد و کیفیت‌های کوچه‌باغ به‌عنوان الگویی بومی در روستاها و شهرهای ایران. جغرافیا و برنامهریزی محیطی، ۳۲(۱)، ۹۳-۱۱۸. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2021.125035.1355
 
Almirón Cuentas, J. A., & Bernedo-Moreira, D. H. (2024). Multisensory design in education: How architecture enhances the learning experience. Land and Architecture, 3, 104. https://doi.org/10.56294/la2024104
Anzani, A. (Ed.). (2022). Conscious dwelling: For transdisciplinary cityscapes (Vol. 20). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97974-4
Aristizabal, S., Byun, K., Porter, P., Clements, N., Campanella, C., Li, L., Mullan, A., Ly, S., Senerat, A., Nenadic, I. Z., Browning, W. D., Loftness, V., & Bauer, B. (2021). Biophilic office design: Exploring the impact of a multisensory approach on human well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101682
Bakir, D., Mansour, Y., Kamel, S., Moustafa, Y., & Khalil, M. H. (2022). The spatial experience of visually impaired and blind: An approach to understanding the importance of multisensory perception. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(2), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100220
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Chen, X., Liu, Y., Li, S., & Sun, W. (2022). Sensory perception mechanism for preparing the combinations of stimuli operation in the architectural experience. Sustainability, 14(13), 7885. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137885
Farkić, J., May, C., Pomfret, G., Sand, M., & Shahvali, M. (2025). Restoring ‘love of life’ through outdoor adventures: A biophilic approach. International Journal of Tourism Research, 27(2), e70023. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.70023
Foroughi, R. (2017). Climate-responsive strategies in vernacular houses in northern Iran. The International Journal of the Constructed Environment, 8(2), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8587/CGP/v08i02/15-26
Grittner, A. L., & Burns, V. F. (2021). Enriching social work research through architectural multisensory methods: Strategies for connecting the built environment and human experience. Qualitative Social Work, 20(3), 792–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020924456
Hung, S. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2022). How do humans value urban nature? Developing the perceived biophilic design scale (PBDs) for preference and emotion. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 76, 127730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127730
Kryklywy, J. H., Ehlers, M. R., Anderson, A. K., & Todd, R. M. (2020). From architecture to evolution: Multisensory evidence of decentralized emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(11), 916–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.08.002
Lin, M.-P., Lin, C.-H., Llonch-Molina, N., & Marine-Roig, E. (2025). The impact of olive oil tourism on multisensory experiences and tourist loyalty. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 40, 101195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2025.101195
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.
Mehrinejad Khotbehsara, E., Purshaban, F., Noormousavi Nasab, S., Baghaei Daemei, A., Eghbal Yakhdani, P., & Vali, R. (2018). Traditional climate responsible solutions in iranian ancient architecture in humid region. Civil Engineering Journal, 4(10), 2502–2512. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-03091176
Rescio, G., Manni, A., Ciccarelli, M., Papetti, A., Caroppo, A., & Leone, A. (2024). A deep learning-based platform for workers’ stress detection using minimally intrusive multisensory devices. Sensors, 24(3), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030947
Schütze, P. (2024). The problem of sustainable AI: A critical assessment of an emerging phenomenon. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.34669/WI.WJDS/4.1.4
Spence, C. (2020). Senses of place: Architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
Xiang, K., Xu, C., & Wang, J. (2021). Understanding the relationship between tourists’ consumption behavior and their consumption substitution willingness under unusual environment. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 483–500. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S303239
Zhang, W., & Du, N. (2025). Multisensory digital heritage spaces as smart environments in sustainable architectural design. Buildings, 15(13), 2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132181