Design fixation: A reconceptualization of cognitive constraint in the design process

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate professor, Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Despite being inherently associated with creativity and innovation, the design process frequently confronts designers with cognitive challenges that constrain their ability to generate original, diverse, and meaningful solutions. Among these challenges, design fixation has been widely recognized as a persistent phenomenon that limits exploratory thinking and narrows the perceived design space. Design fixation refers to a tendency to adhere to initial ideas, familiar precedents, or previously encountered solutions, making it difficult to recognize or pursue alternative possibilities. Rather than constituting a simple mistake or momentary lapse, fixation operates as a multi-layered cognitive condition that shapes the trajectory of design thinking across different stages of the process. In design practice, creativity is commonly understood as the capacity to produce ideas that are novel, useful, and appropriate to the design context. Innovation, in this sense, is not an optional attribute but a defining criterion of successful design. Yet designers often experience moments of mental stagnation, repetition, or premature convergence, particularly during the early phases of ideation. Design fixation typically emerges at this stage, manifesting either as an uncritical reliance on known solutions or as an inability to move beyond an initial conceptual frame. This dual manifestation suggests that fixation is not a singular cognitive bias but a structured interaction between memory, habit, professional knowledge, and situational constraints. Building on this premise, the present study offers a conceptual and structural reconsideration of design fixation through a systematic and critical review of the existing literature. Although fixation has been examined across design research, engineering, and cognitive psychology, it remains theoretically fragmented and inconsistently operationalized. Prior studies often focus on isolated aspects of the phenomenon—such as experimental measurement, impacts on originality, or specific intervention techniques—leaving the conceptual boundaries, internal variations, and evaluative standards of fixation insufficiently clarified. Accordingly, this research addresses three foundational research questions:
How is design fixation defined, and through what characteristics does it manifest within the design process?
What classifications or typologies of design fixation have been proposed in the literature?
What criteria, indicators, or methods are used to identify and evaluate fixation in design contexts?
To ensure methodological rigor and transparency, the review follows the PRISMA 2020 framework, enabling a structured selection and synthesis of relevant studies. The literature is analyzed along three interrelated axes: conceptual understandings of fixation, typological classifications, and evaluative criteria. This structure allows for an integrated reading of diverse sources while preserving the multidimensional nature of the phenomenon.
The findings indicate that design fixation can be productively understood through two complementary analytical lenses. The first lens is grounded in cognitive psychology and draws on concepts such as functional fixedness, mental set, and the path of least resistance, framing fixation as a cognitive constraint rooted in prior knowledge and habitual reasoning patterns. The second lens focuses on observable patterns within the design process itself and conceptualizes fixation as a form of design behavior. This behavioral perspective identifies modes such as unconscious adherence to familiar solutions, conscious blockage in idea generation, and intentional resistance to departing from established design directions.
Although analytically distinct, these perspectives frequently overlap in practice. Fixation often emerges at the intersection of cognitive bias, memory structures, and professional habit, rather than from a single causal mechanism. Recognizing this overlap allows fixation to be analyzed not merely as an individual limitation but as a situated phenomenon shaped by design culture, education, and representational practices. Integrating psychological and design-oriented perspectives therefore provides a more nuanced understanding of how fixation develops and persists in real design situations.
In addressing the third research question, the review identifies two primary categories of evaluative criteria used to recognize and assess design fixation. Direct criteria focus on measurable features of design outcomes, such as the frequency of repeated formal or functional elements, levels of concept originality, and degrees of functional or typological variety. These criteria are commonly employed in experimental and semi-experimental studies. Indirect criteria, by contrast, include self-assessment instruments, behavioral observations, retrospective reflections, and non-intrusive analytical methods. While indirect measures may lack the precision of direct metrics, they offer valuable insight into designers’ internal reasoning processes and the experiential dimensions of fixation. Together, these criteria provide a foundation for both identifying fixation and evaluating the effectiveness of proposed interventions. Based on a synthesis of prior studies, particularly those employing semi-experimental and research-through-design approaches, the research identifies three strategic paths for mitigating design fixation. Internal strategies aim to enhance designers’ cognitive flexibility through techniques such as problem reframing, deliberate incubation, and reflective pauses. External strategies reshape the design environment by introducing varied stimuli, representational diversity, analogical reasoning, critique-based practices, and computational tools that expand the design space. Hybrid strategies integrate internal and external elements within structured, multi-step methods such as SCAMPER and TRIZ, enabling intentional shifts between different modes of thinking and supporting reflective engagement with the design process. A key contribution of this study lies in its multi-layered characterization of design fixation, which connects conceptual clarity with practical relevance. By synthesizing cognitive and behavioral classifications, distinguishing between direct and indirect evaluative criteria, and organizing responses into internal, external, and hybrid strategies, the research frames fixation as an organized and analyzable process rather than an arbitrary obstacle to creativity. Importantly, the findings suggest that fixation should not be understood solely as a negative condition to be eliminated. Instead, fixation can be viewed as an indicator of stabilized cognitive patterns through which designers reuse knowledge and construct meaning. From this perspective, fixation offers analytical value for understanding how design thinking develops over time and how it may be guided through targeted interventions.
In conclusion, by situating design fixation at the intersection of cognitive habit, design culture, and educational frameworks, this study contributes to a more transferable understanding of creative constraints in design processes. The proposed synthesis provides a conceptual foundation for developing diagnostic markers, reflective design techniques, and instructional tools. Future research may extend this work through empirical analyses of situated design behavior, refinement of evaluative indicators, and the design of educational interventions aimed at fostering reflective, flexible, and critically aware design thinking.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

علیپور، ‌لیلا (۱۳۹۸). برداشت صحیح از پیشینه‌های معماری؛ آموزش دانشجویان مبتدی معماری در راستای ارتقای توانایی در برداشت از نمونه‌ها  [رساله برای دریافت درجه دکتری معماری، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران]. تهران.
علیپور، ‌لیلا؛ فیضی، ‌محسن؛ محمدمرادی، ‌اصغر و اکرمی،‌ غلامرضا (۱۳۹۵). برداشت صحیح از نمونه‌ها در ایده‌پردازی معماری. نشریه هنرهای زیبا- معماری وشهرسازی، ۲۱ (۳)،  ۸۱-۹۰. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2016.61104
فیضی، محسن؛ علیپور،‌ لیلا و محمدمرادی، ‌اصغر (۱۳۹۶). برداشت ساختاری از مصادیق معماری. نامه معماری و شهرسازی، ۱۰ (۱۹)، ۵-۲۳. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2017.535
لاوسون، برایان (۱۳۸۷). طراحان چگونه می‌اندیشند. ترجمه حمید ندیمی و فرهاد شریعت‌راد. دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
مهجویان نماری،‌ سیاوش(۱۴۰۱). تحلیل عوامل ایجاد پایبندی در فرآیند طراحی معماری بر اساس سطح خبرگی طراحان [رساله برای دریافت درجه دکتری معماری، دانشگاه تهران، پردیس بین‌الملل]. کیش.
 
Abdelall, E. S., Frank, M. C., & Stone, R. T. (2018). A study of design fixation related to additive manufacturing. Journal of Mechanical Design, 140(4), 041702. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039007
Abdelall, E. S., Frank, M. C., & Stone, R. T. (2018b). Design for manufacturability-based feedback to mitigate design fixation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 140(9), 091701. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040424
Abramowitz, J. S., McKay, D., & Taylor, S. (2008). Clinical handbook of obsessive-compulsive disorder and related problems. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Clinical_Handbook_of_Obsessive_Compulsiv/r7bVp1LO6EgC?hl=en
Agogué, M., Kazakçi, A., Weil, B., & Cassotti, M. (2011). The impact of examples on creative design: Explaining fixation and stimulation effects. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED11) (Vol. 2, pp. 266–274). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84858828659&partnerID=40&md5=27053e6825b669bc5488071361c8f05d
Alipour, L., Faizi, M., Moradi, A. M., & Akrami, G. (2018). A review of design fixation: Research directions and key factors. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 6(1–2), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2017.1320232
Altshuller, G. S., Shulyak, L., & Rodman, S. (2007). The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity (2nd ed.). Technical Innovation Center. http://www.evolocus.com/Textbooks/Altshuller2007.pdf
Amoateng, B. S., Toffah, A. A., Gbadegbe, R. S., Amewu, J., & Junior, A.-A. (2022). Fixation in visual communication: Ideational issues. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(12), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.1012005
Andersson, P. (1994). Early design phases and their role in designing for quality. Journal of Engineering Design, 5(4), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544829408907890
Bayırlı, Ü., & Börekçi, N. A. G. Z. (2022). Correlation between idea generation effort and resulting design solution success: An empirical study using RNEV as a new assessment technique. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101036
Cao, J., Xiong, Y., Li, Y., Liu, L., & Wang, M. (2018). Differences between beginning and advanced design students in analogical reasoning during idea generation: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, Technology and Work, 20(3), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0477-z
Choi, H. H., & Kim, M. J. (2018). Using the digital context to overcome design fixation: A strategy to expand students’ design thinking. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 12(1), 228. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i1.1290
Choo, P. K., Lou, Z. N., Camburn, B. A., Wood, K. L., Koo, B., & Grey, F. (2014). Ideation methods: A first study on measured outcomes with personality type. In Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 7: DETC2014-34954). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2014-34954
Christensen, B., & Schunn, C. (2005). Spontaneous access and analogical incubation effects. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1702&3_7
Christensen, B., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195939
Chrysikou, E. G., & Weisberg, R. W. (2005). Following the wrong footsteps: Fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 1134–1148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1134
Crilly, N. (2015). Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers. Design Studies, 38, 54–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.01.002
Crilly, N. (2019a). Creativity and fixation in the real world: A literature review of case study research. Design Studies, 64, 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.07.002
Crilly, N. (2019b). Methodological diversity and theoretical integration: Research in design fixation as an example of fixation in research design? Design Studies, 65, 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.006
Crilly, N., & Moroşanu Firth, R. (2019). Creativity and fixation in the real world: Three case studies of invention, design and innovation. Design Studies, 64, 169–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.07.003
Cropley, A. J. (2010). Creativity in the classroom: The dark side. In D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaufman, & M. A. Runco (Eds.), The dark side of creativity (1st ed., pp. 297–315). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761225.016
Cross, N. (1999). Design research: A disciplined conversation. Design Issues, 15(2), 5–10.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1511837
Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
Dong, A., & Sarkar, S. (2011). Unfixing design fixation: From cause to computer simulation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01093.x
Dorst, K. (2019). Co-evolution and emergence in design. Design Studies, 65, 60–77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.005
Dugosh, K. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(3), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.009
Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H.-C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 722–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.722
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving (L. S. Lees, Trans.). Psychological Monographs, 58(5), i–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599
Findeli, A., Brouillet, D., Martin, S., Moineau, C., & Tarrago, R. (2008). Research through design and transdisciplinarity: A tentative contribution to the methodology of design research. In D. Durling, C. Rust, L. L. Chen, P. Ashton, & K. Friedman (Eds.), Undisciplined! Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference 2008 (pp. 67–91). Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:149111529
Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1, 1–5. Royal College of Art. https://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/id/eprint/384
Genco, N., Hölttä-Otto, K., & Seepersad, C. C. (2012). An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00041.x
German, T. P., & Barrett, H. C. (2005). Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science, 16(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00771.x
Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11(4), 26–36.
Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, G. (2011). Avoiding design fixation: Transformation and abstraction in mapping from source to target. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01088.x
Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Linkography: Unfolding the design process (Design Thinking, Design Theory). MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262027199/linkography/
Grantham, K., Okudan, G., Simpson, T. W., & Ashour, O. (2010). A study on situated cognition: Product dissection’s effect on redesign activities. In Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 617–626). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-28334
Hernandez, N. V., Shah, J. J., & Smith, S. M. (2010). Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies. Design Studies, 31(4), 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.04.001
Heylighen, A., & Neuckermans, H. (2003). (Learning from experience)? Promises, problems and side-effects of case-based reasoning in architectural design. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 1(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1260/147807703322467432
Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001
Hu, X., Georgiev, G. V., & Casakin, H. (2020). Mitigating design fixation with evolving extended reality technology: An emerging opportunity. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.91
Hubka, V. (1982). Principles of engineering design. Butterworth & Co.
Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. NSF Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Stanford University, CA.
Jia, M., Jiang, S., Hu, J., & Qi, J. (2023). Toward understanding sources and influences of design fixation: A focus on example stimuli and background of novice designers. Journal of Mechanical Design, 145(5), 051402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056259
Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2008). Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing. Design Studies, 29(4), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.03.001
Kershaw, T. C., HölttäOtto, K., & Lee, Y. S. (2011). The effect of prototyping and critical feedback on fixation in engineering design. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 807–812). Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5kq942pr
Kohn, N. W., & Smith, S. M. (2011). Collaborative fixation: Effects of others’ ideas on brainstorming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1699
Leahy, K., Daly, S. R., McKilligan, S., & Seifert, C. M. (2020). Design fixation from initial examples: Provided versus self-generated ideas. Journal of Mechanical Design, 142(10), 101402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047094
Linsey, J. S., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K. L., & Schunn, C. (2010). A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(4), 041003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001110
Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior: A variational approach to the effect of Einstellung. University of Oregon Books.
Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1970). Effects of preconceptions and communications on impressions of a person. The Journal of Social Psychology, 81(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1970.9922446
Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54 (6), i–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0068040
MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wagner, C. (1994). Stimulating ideas through creative software. Management Science, 40(11), 1514–1532. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.11.1514
Mauldin, R. G. (1988). Design fixation: An inhibition of creativity and quality in engineering design [PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University]. TX.
McKerlie, D., & MacLean, A. (1994). Reasoning with design rationale: Practical experience with design space analysis. Design Studies, 15(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)90026-4
Moreno, D. P., Blessing, L. T., Yang, M. C., Hernández, A. A., & Wood, K. L. (2016). Overcoming design fixation: Design by analogy studies and nonintuitive findings. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM, 30(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060416000068
Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2007). The influence of open goals on the acquisition of problem-relevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 876–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.876
Neroni, M. A., Vasconcelos, L. A., & Crilly, N. (2017). Computer-based “mental set” tasks: An alternative approach to studying design fixation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 139(7), 071102.https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036562
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking: A symposium held at the University of Colorado (pp. 63–119). Atherton Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/13117-003
Nguyen, T. A., & Zeng, Y. (2017). A theoretical model of design fixation. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 5(3–4), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2016.1207566
Otto, K. N., & Wood, K. L. (1998). Product evolution: A reverse engineering and redesign methodology. Research in Engineering Design, 10(4), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001639870003
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pedret, K., & Shu, L. H. (2019). Informing design defixation using interventions for psychiatric disorders. In Proceedings of the ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 7, DETC2019-98277). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-98277
Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies, 17(4), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00023-3.
Rodgers, P. A., Green, G., & McGown, A. (2000). Using concept sketches to track design progress. Design Studies, 21(5), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00018-1
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2007, August). Development of a method for assessing design creativity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED07), Paris, France. https://www.designsociety.org/publication/25506/development_of_a_method_for_assessing_design_creativity
Segers, N. M., De Vries, B., & Achten, H. H. (2005). Do word graphs stimulate design? Design Studies, 26(6), 625–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.05.002
Shah, J. J., Kulkarni, S. V., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1315592
Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0
Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2015). Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies, 39, 70–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.04.004
Smith, S. M. (1995a). Creative cognition: Demystifying creativity. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), The mind at work in the classroom: In literacy & thinking (pp. 31–46). Routledge.
Smith, S. M. (1995b). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 229–250). MIT Press.
Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1989). Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(4), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334612
Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. The American Journal of Psychology, 104(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422851
Smith, S. M., & Linsey, J. (2011). A three-pronged approach for overcoming design fixation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01087.x
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1998). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge University Press.
Toh, C. A., Miller, S. R., & Okudan Kremer, G. E. (2012). The impact of product dissection activities on the novelty of design outcomes. In Proceedings of the ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 7, pp. 615–624). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2012-70421
Tseng, I., Moss, J., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2008). Overcoming blocks in conceptual design: The effects of open goals and analogical similarity on idea generation. In Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 4, DETC2008-49276, pp. 3–9). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2008-49276
Vasconcelos, L. A., & Crilly, N. (2016). Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges. Design Studies, 42, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.11.001
Viswanathan, V., & Linsey, J. (2011). Design fixation in physical modeling: An investigation on the role of sunk cost. In Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 9, DETC2011-47862, pp. 119–130). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-47862
Wang, S., Okada, T., & Takagi, K. (2023). How to effectively overcome fixation: A systematic review of fixation and defixation studies on the basis of fixation source and problem type. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1183025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1183025
Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1010
Wei, R., Heng Gu, E., & Yu, C. (2023, October 9). Utilizing patent data for enhanced design creativity and reduced fixation in product design. In IASDR 2023: Life-Changing Design. https://doi.org/10.21606/iasdr.2023.604
Whitfield, P. R. (1975). Creativity in industry. Penguin Books.
Yang, M. C. (2009). Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0055-0
Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/excerpts/young.pdf?t=1
Youmans, R. J. (2011a). Design fixation in the wild: Design environments and their influence on fixation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01089.x
Youmans, R. J. (2011b). The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation. Design Studies, 32(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.08.001
Youmans, R. J., & Arciszewski, T. (2012). Design fixation: A cloak of many colors. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Design computing and cognition ’12 (pp. 115–129). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_7
Youmans, R. J., & Arciszewski, T. (2014). Design fixation: Classifications and modern methods of prevention. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 28(2, Special Issue), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060414000043
Youmans, R. J., & Jee, B. D. (2007). Fudging the numbers: Distributing chocolate influences student evaluations of an undergraduate course. Teaching of Psychology, 34(4), 245–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280701700318
Zahner, D., Nickerson, J. V., Tversky, B., Corter, J. E., & Ma, J. (2010). A fix for fixation? Rerepresenting and abstracting as creative processes in the design of information systems. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060410000077
 
Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning
Volume 18, Issue 50
March 2026
Pages 85-112

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics