Socio-spatial characteristics supportive of children's playful activities in public open spaces of affordable housing complexes; Case study: MASKAN-e-MEHR, Sanandaj

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning & Design, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

2 M.A. in Urban Design, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Urban Planning & Design, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

Abstract

In residential areas, public open spaces offer various opportunities for children's desired activity. Examining children's activities at specific locations highlights the environmental affordances offered by the environment, informing potential interventions and future design considerations. To study children's play in a densely populated affordable housing complex, we used behavioral mapping to observe their activities in open areas over a year. We recorded 4,453 activities among children aged 2 to 18. These records captured place-centered data related to their age, gender, postures, and the individual/group mode of activity. By inputting this data into a Geographic Information System (GIS), we were able to produce place-oriented maps that highlighted where and how these activities occurred. Qualitative analysis of the GIS maps helped us gain a comprehensive understanding of the socio-spatial features that support playful activities. These features include spatial characteristics, temporal elements, and social dimensions. Additionally, we employed non-parametric statistical methods to analyze the qualitative data related to age, gender, and activity types. The study revealed that playful activities were the most common way children used the open spaces. These activities, however, are varied based on  age and gender, and were also influenced by the spatial layout. Boys, particularly from the age of six onwards, were more prominent and unrestricted in their presence and activities within the open spaces compared to girls. This difference peaked during adolescence. The spatial layout of these areas played a significant role in shaping children's play. Areas closest to apartment buildings provided a safe and engaging environment for younger children (under six) and activities requiring adult supervision and socialization. These areas typically offered settings suitable for quieter activities. In contrast, boys over six often dominated areas further away from the buildings, engaging in active physical play. These areas typically had open centers suitable for running and games, often found near pedestrian areas, riding paths, and parking lots. Although the study identified some gender differences in play patterns across different zones, both areas near and far from apartment buildings offered important features that supported play. By providing both sociable edges suitable for quieter activities and open centers for active play, these features catered to a range of developmental needs. To encourage children’s safe exploration beyond their immediate surroundings, a two-zone design strategy is proposed. Zone 1, situated in close proximity to apartment blocks, would function as semi-private spaces designed to accommodate a variety of recreational, physical, and social activities for resident children. This zone would prioritize features that enable parental supervision while mitigating vehicular interference. Zone 2, encompassing public spaces further from the buildings, would cater to children's independent playfull activities. These zones would be interconnected through a network of pedestrian and cycling paths. Adult superviosion in these zones would create safe settings for all children to engage in playful activities, especially those who might feel less comfortable alone (younger kids and girls). This two-zone approach, with both supervision and connectivity, has the potential to make affordable housing complexes more inclusive and stimulating for children.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

روشن‌دل، تکتم، بهرامی، بختیار، سعیدی، مهدی، و عرفانی، گوران (1402). ویژگی‌های محیطی مؤثر بر تحرک و فعالیت فیزیکی کودکان در محله از دیدگاه آنان؛ مطالعه موردی: شهر مشهد. فصلنامه مطالعات شهری. 13(49)، 3-16. https://doi.org/10.22034/urbs.2023.62738
محمدزاده نبیی، ائلیار و قره‌بگلو، مینو (1401). کاربست بازی وارسازی در فضاهای شهری جهت ارتقاء حضورپذیری کودکان اوتیستیک. منظر، 14(58)، 52-65.
 
Bans-Akutey, A., & Tiimub, B. M. (2021). Triangulation in research. Academia Letters, 2, 1-6.
Barrable, A., & Booth, D. (2020). Increasing nature connection in children: A mini review of interventions. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 506441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00492.
Bourke, J. (2017). Children’s experiences of their everyday walks through a complex urban landscape of belonging. Children’s Geographies, 15(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1192582.
Carroll, P., Witten, K., Kearns, R., & Donovan, P. (2015). Kids in the City: Children’s Use and Experiences of Urban Neighbourhoods in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Urban Design, 20(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1044504.
Chawla, L. (2016). Growing up in an urbanizing world. New York: Routledge.
Cox, A. (2020). Freedom to flourish: why independent mobility and access to the public realm is important for youth development. In J. Loebach, S. Little, A. Cox, & P. E. Owens (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Designing Public Spaces for Young People (pp. 22–38). New York: Routledge.
Das, R., & Banerjee, A. (2021). Identifying the parameters for assessment of child-friendliness in urban neighborhoods in Indian cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1863815.
Derr, V., Chawla, L., & Mintzer, M. (2018). Placemaking with children and youth: participatory practices for planning sustainable communities. New York: New Village Press.
Derr, V., & Tarantini, E. (2016). “Because we are all people”: outcomes and reflections from young people’s participation in the planning and design of child-friendly public spaces. Local Environment, 21(12), 1534–1556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2016.1145643.
Dyment, J., & O’Connell, T. S. (2013). The impact of playground design on play choices and behaviors of pre-school children. Children’s Geographies, 11(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812272.
Fjørtoft, I. (2004). Landscape as Playscape: The Effects of Natural Environments on Children’s Play and Motor Development. Children, Youth and Environment, 14(2), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02242.x.
Hughes, F. P. (2009). Children, play, and development. Thousand Oaks: SAGE publications.
Hjelmér, C. (2020). Free play, free choices? Influence and construction of gender in preschools in different local contexts. Education Inquiry, 11(2), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1724585.
Katsavounidou, G. (2021). Child, play, and urban space: a historical overview and a holistic paradigm for child-centered urbanism. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 16(4), 430-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.2005120.
Kemple, K. M., Oh, J. H., Kenney, E., & Smith-Bonahue, T. (2016). The Power of Outdoor Play and Play in Natural Environments. Childhood Education, 92(6), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2016.1251793.
Laaksoharju, T., Rappe, E., & Kaivola, T. (2012). Garden affordances for social learning, play, and for building nature–child relationship. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.01.003.
Lee E. Y., Bains A., Hunter, S., Ament, A., Brazo-Sayavera, J., Carson, V., Hakimi, S., Huang, W. Y., Janssen, I., Lee, M.,  & Lim, H. (2021). Systematic review of the correlates of outdoor play and time among children aged 3-12 years. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 18, 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01097-9.
Lee, H., Tamminen, K. A., Clark, A. M., Slater, L., Spence, J. C., & Holt, N. L. (2015). A meta-study of qualitative research examining determinants of children’s independent active free play. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0165-9.
Loebach, J., Sanches, M., Jaffe, J., & Elton-Marshall, T. (2021). Paving the way for outdoor play: examining socio-environmental barriers to community-based outdoor play. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(7), 3617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073617.
Loebach, J., & Cox, A. (2020). Tool for Observing Play Outdoors (TOPO): A New Typology for Capturing Children’s Play Behaviors in Outdoor Environments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155611.
Loebach, J., Cox, A., & Little, S. (2020). Behavior Mapping to Support the Development of Youth-Friendly Public Outdoor Spaces. In J. Loebach, L. Sarah, A. Cox, & P. E. Owens (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Designing Public Spaces for Young People (first, pp. 308–326). Routledge.
Loebach, J., & Gilliland, J. (2019). Examining the Social and Built Environment Factors Influencing Children’s Independent Use of Their Neighborhoods and the Experience of Local Settings as Child-Friendly. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 42, 539-553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19828444.
Loebach, J., Sanches, M., Jaffe, J., & Elton-Marshall, T. (2021). Paving the Way for Outdoor Play: Examining Socio-Environmental Barriers to Community-Based Outdoor Play. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073617.
Malone, K. (2016). Children’s Place Encounters: Place-Based Participatory Research to Design a Child- Friendly and Sustainable Urban Development. In N. Ansell, N. Klocker, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Geographies of Global Issues: Change and Threat (pp. 501–530). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-95-8.
Mansournia, S., Bahrami, B., Farahani, L. M., & Aram, F. (2021). Understanding children’s perceptions and activities in urban public spaces: The case study of Zrêbar Lake Waterfront in Kurdistan. Urban Studies, 58(2), 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020903008.
Miranda, N., Larrea, I., Muela, A., & Barandiaran, A. (2017). Preschool children’s social play and involvement in the outdoor environment. Early Education and Development, 28(5), 525-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1250550.
Parent, N., Guhn, M., Brussoni, M., Almas, A., & Oberle, E. (2021). Social determinants of playing outdoors in the neighbourhood: family characteristics, trust in neighbours and daily outdoor play in early childhood. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 112, 120-127.
Riazi, M., & Emami, A. (2018). Residential satisfaction in affordable housing: A mixed method study. Cities, 82(April), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.013.
Sirkko, R., Kyrönlampi, T., & Puroila, A. M. (2019). Children’s Agency: Opportunities and Constraints. International Journal of Early Childhood, 51(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-019-00252-5.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. In United Nations. United Nations.
Villanueva, K., Badland, H., Kvalsvig, A., O’Connor, M., Christian, H., Woolcock, G., Giles-Corti, B., & Goldfeld, S. (2016). Can the Neighborhood Built Environment Make a Difference in Children’s Development? Building the Research Agenda to Create Evidence for Place-Based Children’s Policy. Academic Pediatrics, 16(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.09.006.
Visser, K., & van Aalst, I. (2022). Neighbourhood Factors in Children’s Outdoor Play: A Systematic Literature Review. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 113(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12505.
Wang, X., Woolley, H., Tang, Y., Liu, H. yi, & Luo, Y. (2018). Young children’s and adults’ perceptions of natural play spaces: A case study of Chengdu, southwestern China. Cities, 72(August 2017), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.011.
Warner, M. E., & Zhang, X. (2019). Planning Communities for All Ages. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 42(4), 554-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19828058.
Weir, H. (2023). Spaces for children’s play and travel close to home: the importance of threshold spaces. Children’s Geographies, 21(6), 1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2023.2192338.
Yogman, M., Garner, A., Hutchinson, J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Baum, R., Gambon, T., Lavin, A., Mattson, G., Wissow, L., Hill, D. L., Ameenuddin, N., Chassiakos, Y. (Linda) R., Cross, C., Boyd, R., Mendelson, R., Moreno, M. A., Radesky, J., Swanson, W. S., … Smith, J. (2018). The Power of Play: A Pediatric Role in Enhancing Development in Young Children. Pediatrics, 142(3), e20182058. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2058.
Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning
Volume 17, Issue 44
September 2024
Pages 115-139

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics