<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه هنر ایران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>نامه معماری و شهرسازی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2717-1299</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Development and Promotion BA Interior Design Course, Solutions and the Necessity of its Forming in the Prestigious Universities in Iran</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>توسعه و گسترش دوره کارشناسی معماری داخلی راه حل ها و ضرورت تشکیل آن در دانشگا ه های معتبر</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>5</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>24</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">189</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30480/aup.2010.189</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>مصطفی</FirstName>
					<LastName>کیانی</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار گروه معماری دانشگاه هنر</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>11</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Interior design for decades that the system of higher education of Iran has been stagnate. In recent years it&lt;br /&gt;has been a mutation and transformation in attitude, but still no prosperity in developing training expertise&lt;br /&gt;in this field. The field that is most closely related to architecture and many of technical and artistic courses&lt;br /&gt;and interdisciplinary sciences. Object and purpose of this article is representing and then description need&lt;br /&gt;and urge for the opening and development course in &quot;Bachelor&quot; and the basis is the approval for&lt;br /&gt;expanding the council for the Ministry of science, research and technology to this point several years ago.&lt;br /&gt;Interior design has passed full transition period in the word. Years ago, almost there were no plans for&lt;br /&gt;interior design of colleges or universities, but little by little there were been changes took it and today&lt;br /&gt;seeing an active and reliable process in principals, practices, programs and education standards. Perhaps&lt;br /&gt;there is no specific ranking in education of interior design in different countries, but there are schools and&lt;br /&gt;colleges with completive grading methods and training facilities. Also, validity and credit of a school and&lt;br /&gt;its facilities, programs and educational styles are very important. This article reviews lessons and field,&lt;br /&gt;with their scheme, a comparative study with other universities in the Iran, the necessity of the formation&lt;br /&gt;and expansion of the field, the lacuna and vacuum in the range of artistic and architectural fields, the&lt;br /&gt;community needs to graduate academic experts and expression properties of this creative and innovative&lt;br /&gt;field. While trying reloading obstacles and problems, offering suggestions and strategies of teaching and&lt;br /&gt;education courses position at this point and especially in prestigious universities. Although the approach in&lt;br /&gt;the education system for graduate degree (M.A.) in of two prestigious universities and undergraduate&lt;br /&gt;institutions in several young and not so equipped and talented staff in recent years has been implemented,&lt;br /&gt;but the recovery position now needs to taken major universities. The position that was needed take as a&lt;br /&gt;field independent and not scattered years ago. History of interior design in Iran so far has not been&lt;br /&gt;classified as done. It is a large part of Iranian and Islamic architecture. Historical Background of interior&lt;br /&gt;design in old spaces and ancient buildings hase a clear and distinctive position. In the Iranian architectural&lt;br /&gt;heritage, all decorated designs, elements, ornaments, calligraphy, decorative brickworks, carvings and&lt;br /&gt;decoration in wood and metal belong to interior design. The same view provides the appropriate&lt;br /&gt;opportunity for stablishing and developing interior design field in artistic universities of Iran. It can with&lt;br /&gt;coordination, integration, fulfillment and combining with modern interior design and architecture to&lt;br /&gt;create targeted area. Using teachers in various disciplines, development and implementation of the&lt;br /&gt;seriousness of art courses, technical, scientific and workshop, and many of the facts ignored, that is what&lt;br /&gt;this paper has concluded. Logical and efficient to get off the field right at this stage it is anticipated that&lt;br /&gt;students accepted for this string of talented people, be creative and curious, such as degree of architecture&lt;br /&gt;and its equivalent, with technical and artistic capabilities are.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">معماری داخلی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">طراحی داخلی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">معماری</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">کارشناسی</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_189_9498ced9707ae13bb903f2fdc9ccd4fb.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه هنر ایران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>نامه معماری و شهرسازی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2717-1299</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Analysis of the Building of Mosalla (Public Prayer Place) in Rasht City</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>تحلیلی بر بنای مصلّای شهر رشت</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>25</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>42</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">190</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30480/aup.2010.190</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>مژگان</FirstName>
					<LastName>خاکپور</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی دکترای پژوهش هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>حسنعلی</FirstName>
					<LastName>پورمند</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار گروه پژوهش هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Criticism of the architectural works, which are not very old, is one of the constructive forward looking&lt;br /&gt;critics that may be effective in positive changes of design methods. Determination of the positive aspects&lt;br /&gt;of an architectural work and the statement of the project proper specifications are the methods requiring&lt;br /&gt;architectural work criticism. Some of the most important duties of the common critics in this domain are&lt;br /&gt;the extension of better perception and understanding of the space, discrimination of the good and bad, and&lt;br /&gt;the judgment in relation to the architectural work and also the promotion of the project following to&lt;br /&gt;supporting, amendment, and the optimization of the designing approaches in creation of a more desirable&lt;br /&gt;space. In this article, which has been performed on the basis of descriptive- analytic research and with&lt;br /&gt;library study method and field investigations, at first, we reviewed the aims of criticism of the&lt;br /&gt;architectural works and then interpretive (hermeneutic) criticism, i.e. the criticism method used in&lt;br /&gt;critization of the building of Mosalla (Public Prayer Place) in Rasht City, was mentioned briefly. The main&lt;br /&gt;part of the article is related to the statement of the specifications of the building of Mosalla (Public Prayer&lt;br /&gt;Place) in Rasht City that has challenged the building with a view to interpretive (hermeneutic) criticism.&lt;br /&gt;At the end part of the article, the positive and negative aspects of the work were mentioned with the aim of&lt;br /&gt;using the criticism advantages in strengthening of proper methods of design in the future. Also some&lt;br /&gt;aspects of designing of the building of Mosalla (Public Prayers Place), which had lasting effects on&lt;br /&gt;individuals&#039; mind, have been distinguished from those aspects, which decrease the space desirability. At&lt;br /&gt;all, the whole all points of design review obtained from criticism do not have equal value in people&#039;s mind&lt;br /&gt;and all people do not have the same view against the building. On the strength of looking forward for&lt;br /&gt;durability and public acceptance of a building, if it is tried to decrease the negative aspects, attractiveness&lt;br /&gt;of the architectural work increases and therefore, the quality of the designed spaces will be improved. But&lt;br /&gt;with a focus on the large number of the positive or negative aspects of an architectural work, the building&lt;br /&gt;is considered as qualified or unqualified for attractiveness in people&#039;s minds. In relation to the building of&lt;br /&gt;Mosalla, the positive aspects were more than the negative ones that caused acceptance and attractiveness&lt;br /&gt;of this architectural work in one of the main areas’ of the city.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نقد تفسیری</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">هرمنوتیک</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نقد معماری</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">مسجد جامع</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">مصلّای رشت</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_190_41f925c7a83ecbddabb34ffbf05beb44.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه هنر ایران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>نامه معماری و شهرسازی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2717-1299</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Recognition of the Rural Architecture of Biological Complexes of Persian Gulf Coast in Laft Port</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>بازشناخت بوم ساخت مجتمع های زیستی سواحل خلیج فارس در بندر لافت</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>43</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>60</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">191</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30480/aup.2010.191</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>محمدرضا</FirstName>
					<LastName>پورجعفر</LastName>
<Affiliation>استاد گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>محمدرضا</FirstName>
					<LastName>لیلیان</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی دکترای معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>مهدیه</FirstName>
					<LastName>عابدی</LastName>
<Affiliation>کارشناس ارشد طراحی شهری، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>الهام</FirstName>
					<LastName>رضوی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قزوین</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>07</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;br /&gt;This study is intended to introduce the architecture specifications of Laft Port in Qeshm Island, in the&lt;br /&gt;south of Iran. Qeshm Island with the 1500 square km. is the largest island in Iran and in the Persian Gulf.&lt;br /&gt;Laft is a village in the rural area of Qeshm, in Hormozgan Province. The unique architectural features, as&lt;br /&gt;well as the environmental context of Laft with its potential are among the reasons why Laft has been&lt;br /&gt;selected for this research. Providing correct information about Laft could help to introduce the cultural and&lt;br /&gt;social potential. The general characteristics of Laft’s architecture is affected by the architecture of the&lt;br /&gt;central part of Iran and Arabic architecture of the Persian Gulf region of Iran, incorporating central court&lt;br /&gt;yards, wind catchers, and arches. Professional readers with the architecture decorative elements and the&lt;br /&gt;plaster works take after Arabic architecture, while major physical elements of design reflect Iranian&lt;br /&gt;architecture. The most obvious architectural feature of the houses is their variously-sized windbreaks&lt;br /&gt;(wind towers). The people of Laft constructed these elements for cooling the inner space of the building in&lt;br /&gt;summer. The buildings of Laft are constructed close to each other, with winding and narrow alleys. The&lt;br /&gt;village is in the Qeshm Island in Persian Gulf. The buildings in the background are dhows that are&lt;br /&gt;traditional constructions which are still being constructed in the same traditional way by local materials.&lt;br /&gt;Their form is also visually appealing. The originality concealed in their chronic structures, refers to the&lt;br /&gt;tale of Iran&#039;s extensive culture. Their pure and innocent nature obviously affected the melodious and&lt;br /&gt;decent traditional architecture. However, with development of industrial productions in Iran, the&lt;br /&gt;traditional characteristics disappeared. The changes were more in urban areas while rural and remote sites&lt;br /&gt;as the cases of Laft village remained safe and protected. Thus, this study aims to recognize the main&lt;br /&gt;characters of traditional architecture in the region and the ways to endure it in order to have a more&lt;br /&gt;valuable architecture. Researching on “Laft” has totally gained an inclusive encouragement of the local&lt;br /&gt;residents in order to regenerate their cultural values in the globalization era as a Free Economic zone.&lt;br /&gt;Another part was and entire revitalization in the coastal boundaries. The most serious part of the study was&lt;br /&gt;the public consciousness about the people’s social heritage. The aim of rehabilitating in laft is making a&lt;br /&gt;residential background suitable for human habitation and to give confidence the local residents to keep on&lt;br /&gt;living there. To approach the above goals, it`s needed for the constructors to be familiar with the regional&lt;br /&gt;materials and specialties. This is in indeed important in coastal sites of the Persian Gulf. The research&lt;br /&gt;method of this study is descriptive and analytical. Experimental methods are also utilized with particular&lt;br /&gt;attention to the climatic characters (muggy weather) of the Laft region. And finally, we have concluded&lt;br /&gt;that: there, you can still find a kind of traditional build form with unique architectural style of the region.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">بندر لافت</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">بوم ساخت</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">مجتمع های زیستی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">مهار ت های ساخت</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_191_a51c494c23c7d34fbc54f9eabc3e83ca.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه هنر ایران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>نامه معماری و شهرسازی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2717-1299</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of the Concept of Eco-museum with the Museums</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>بررسی مقایس های مفهوم اکوموزه با موز ه های سنتی</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>61</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>76</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">192</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30480/aup.2010.192</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>مهناز</FirstName>
					<LastName>اشرفی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دکترای معماری، معاون پژوهشکده حفاظت آثار و اشیای تاریخی فرهنگی، سازمان میراث فرهنگی</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>15</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The human being places his past and present in museums, in order to refer to the and think about his&lt;br /&gt;future. Along with changes in the course of time, the science of curatorship has employed modern and&lt;br /&gt;different methods and approaches than the past for conservation of cultural – natural heritage and based on&lt;br /&gt;its requirements has been so much intermingled with architecture, social sciences and environment. As the&lt;br /&gt;concept of conservation is not limited to restoration, documentation, and introducing object, the museum&lt;br /&gt;-also- is not limited to a place wherein objects are kept to be visited by the public. Traditional museums&lt;br /&gt;focused on public administrations and in any case influenced by a nostalgic, traditional approach to the&lt;br /&gt;cultural heritage. In the 1970s and particularly in 1970 and after the energy crisis a powerful movement of&lt;br /&gt;rediscovery of local culture emerged and the states comprehension of heritage concept changed. Following&lt;br /&gt;the mentioned global procedure and movement, formulation of different charters focusing in consideration&lt;br /&gt;of rural habitats are on the agenda, as establishment of rural museums, museums of farming life and ecomuseums.&lt;br /&gt;Now, we observe open space museums, natural parks and eco- museums, which have a major&lt;br /&gt;role in reinforcement, revival, and exhibit the mankind&#039;s creativity in their environment, in different&lt;br /&gt;designs and sizes that are common in different countries. Generally speaking, eco-museums have deep&lt;br /&gt;roots in the development of museology. They are in essence, museums which are more than institutes of&lt;br /&gt;cultural heritage preservation. Eco-museums policies and practices, which embody cultural as well as local&lt;br /&gt;development initiatives, are outstanding examples of this new movement. Through analysis of the trend&lt;br /&gt;and various approaches in this regard, this paper tries to focus on the factors and differentiations between&lt;br /&gt;eco-museums and traditional museums. Moreover, it introduces existing challenges from different&lt;br /&gt;viewpoints, including formation and different functional patterns. The results show that if this type of&lt;br /&gt;museums is targeted by major touristic activities in long run, they will not only doom to fail but also they&lt;br /&gt;will consume the very heritage they erected for. When there is a conflict between tourism and preservation&lt;br /&gt;of culture the later must be given priority. The problem is that many eco-museums are not really instituted&lt;br /&gt;for exchanging information; many of them were created solely to obtain the financing available under&lt;br /&gt;regional laws. Public participation of locals is essential to the eco-museums. This principle should cover a&lt;br /&gt;very wide scope something more than mere exhibition of their tradition and appearance before the visitors.&lt;br /&gt;From the other side, in selection of place and type of activities of an eco-museum, not only the socio –&lt;br /&gt;cultural compatibility is of importance but also it is necessary to consider environmental structure of the&lt;br /&gt;region wherein the museum is established. There is no definite style for eco-museums. They will all be&lt;br /&gt;different according to the specific culture and situation of the society they present. Social development is a&lt;br /&gt;prerequisite for establishing eco-museums in living societies. The benefit of the inhabitants must be&lt;br /&gt;enhanced in ways that do not compromise traditional, cultural and natural values.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">موزه</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">اکوموزه</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">موزة فضای باز</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">موزة روستایی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">حفاظت</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_192_eaf48b98f8e9d87cc5f90b92d1d69c7d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه هنر ایران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>نامه معماری و شهرسازی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2717-1299</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Typology of Public Participation Techniques in Urban Planning based on Different Levels of Participation</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>گونه شناسی تکنیک های مشارکت شهروندان در برنامه ریزی شهری، برمبنای سطوح مختلف مشارکت</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>77</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>102</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">193</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30480/aup.2010.193</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>مرجان</FirstName>
					<LastName>شرفی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ای، دانشگاه هنر تهران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>ناصر</FirstName>
					<LastName>برک پور</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر تهران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>12</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;br /&gt;Public participation is a process through which public concerns, values and needs are considered for&lt;br /&gt;collective decision making. In this process, interrelations and interactions between people and decision&lt;br /&gt;makers should be made to make better decisions. In last years, Public participation has been more&lt;br /&gt;considered theoretically and practically, and significant role of people in solving urban problems has made&lt;br /&gt;it to an obvious necessity in urban planning and management. So, many societies try to encourage sense of&lt;br /&gt;participation, discourse and consultation to realise sustainability, efficiency of policies and development.&lt;br /&gt;Public Participation, which is known as a basic element in planning, is possible in different levels. In the&lt;br /&gt;lowest level, citizen involvement can result to stable and accurate decisions based on public needs, and&lt;br /&gt;cause plan acceptance by its users significantly. In the highest level and long term, citizen participation&lt;br /&gt;can expand and strengthen democracy through advisory, direct and explicit techniques. In this condition,&lt;br /&gt;citizens find themselves as a part of society and thus spread public trust. Now, one of the most concerns of&lt;br /&gt;urban planners is that by which methods and techniques, participatory plans can be carried out&lt;br /&gt;successfully. There are different classification of citizen participation in urban planning and management.&lt;br /&gt;Present paper aims to introduce different levels of participation and different categories of participation&lt;br /&gt;techniques through other countries experiences to formulate and present a new synthetic classification.&lt;br /&gt;The conclusion of this paper is important, because cognition of different levels of participation and&lt;br /&gt;useable techniques for every level give a chance to planners to use the most efficient techniques in order to&lt;br /&gt;increase the success and implementation of participatory plans. This research present a five-level category&lt;br /&gt;of participation based on combining different categories. In this category, participation defines in five&lt;br /&gt;levels including getting information to the public, getting information from the public, using public views,&lt;br /&gt;public consensus and public empowerment. In the lowest level, getting information to the public is done&lt;br /&gt;merely. In higher levels, public influence increases in planning process and in the highest level, planners&lt;br /&gt;enforce merely public decisions. According to what mentioned above the diagram you have seen beneath&lt;br /&gt;shows the proposed category of participation levels and techniques.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">مشارکت مردمی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">تکنیک های مشارکت</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">سطوح مشارکت</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">طبقه بندی تکنیک ها</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_193_9dafb5d8cad6c3e5dedad1ddb4e8db4d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه هنر ایران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>نامه معماری و شهرسازی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2717-1299</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Theory of Planning and the Contexts Forming Them From the Early Decades of 20 Century until the Mid 1970s</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>نظریه های برنامه ریزی و زمینه های شکل دهنده ی آن ها از اوایل قرن بیستم تا اواسط دهه١٩٧٠</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>103</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>120</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">194</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30480/aup.2010.194</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>ایرج</FirstName>
					<LastName>اسدی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، دانشگاه تهران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>احمد</FirstName>
					<LastName>سعیدنیا</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار دانشکده شهرسازی، دانشگاه تهران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Present paper aims at examination of planning theory until mid 1970s and the contexts causing them.&lt;br /&gt;Selecting 1970 decade is for this reason that the point of time is a mediate between two distinct types of&lt;br /&gt;planning theories: theories of planning until 1970 (mainly positivist), and communicative planning&lt;br /&gt;theories (post positivist) that are characteristics of recent decades. Facing the questions about why&lt;br /&gt;planning theories are forming and how they are evolving, this paper, learnt from philosophers of science,&lt;br /&gt;presuppose that all theories are created to provide an explanation for a theoretical tension resulting from a&lt;br /&gt;problematic situation. Planning theories are affected from external factors and contexts. They are not&lt;br /&gt;context-less (the condition dominant in natural science ), but they are made by individuals within the&lt;br /&gt;social, economic and political systems of a real world. Planning theorists try to explain, justify and&lt;br /&gt;interpret planning in their own social context. In other words, theory and theorizer are constrained by&lt;br /&gt;planning practice and complex social, economic, political and epistemological system within which they&lt;br /&gt;operate. Changes in planning reality and their contexts probably will be reflected in theorizers’ perceptions&lt;br /&gt;of their profession and nature of theory, social processes and changes. So, for understanding planning&lt;br /&gt;theories and their evolutions, we must know that the economic, social, political and epistemological forces&lt;br /&gt;produce them. This paper tries to provide a brief description of planning theories and different factors&lt;br /&gt;forming them with focusing on three distinct periods. After defining some basic concepts, the paper&lt;br /&gt;presents a typology of theories within urban and regional planning. Then, the paper bases its examination&lt;br /&gt;on a specific type of theories discussed, namely planning theory or theory of planning. In later stage,&lt;br /&gt;different period of planning theorizing is presented according to the views of main planning scholars: there&lt;br /&gt;are three main period of planning theory until mid 1970s, as follows: a) first period from beginning of&lt;br /&gt;twenty century to the end of 1950s which is well known as a master planning or blueprint period. In this&lt;br /&gt;period there is not a planning theory. Second period starts from the end of 1950 to the end1960. This&lt;br /&gt;period can be named the era of dominance of systematic planning or procedural planning theory. The third&lt;br /&gt;period starts from early 1970s. In this period, there is not any dominant planning theory but there are&lt;br /&gt;several planning theories such as incremental planning, advocacy planning, mixed scanning, political&lt;br /&gt;economy and transactive planning. Within each planning theorizing periods, different planning theories&lt;br /&gt;and factors significant on forming them are discussed. Before doing conclusion, a brief analytical report of&lt;br /&gt;evolution of planning theory in recent decades are presented. Examination indicates that planning field in&lt;br /&gt;recent decades is dominated by communicative planning theories and post-positive theories from 1980 on.&lt;br /&gt;Examination of this period, also, demonstrates that external conditions such as transformation of social&lt;br /&gt;theories and epistemological changes originated from knowledge field outside of planning are significant&lt;br /&gt;in creation of post positive theories of planning. Theory of communicative action as a social theory from&lt;br /&gt;Habermas is the most important framework theory for planning theorists. In final section, paper concludes&lt;br /&gt;on different contextual forces which are vital in creation of planning theories.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نظریه برنامه ریزی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نظریه در برنامه ریزی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نظریه برنامه ریزی رویه ای</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">دوره تکثرگرایی نظری</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_194_b207d32e9cf22a4380bddc7db3ad3764.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه هنر ایران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>نامه معماری و شهرسازی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2717-1299</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Review of Sustainable Community Development Policies through an Assetbased Approach, with Emphasis on Social &amp; Physical Capital</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>مروری بر سیاست های توسعه پایدار محله ای با رویکرد دارایی مبنا و تأکید بر سرمایه های اجتماعی و کالبدی</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>121</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>140</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">195</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30480/aup.2010.195</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>راضیه</FirstName>
					<LastName>رضازاده</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>علی</FirstName>
					<LastName>سلسله</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The increasing complexities of the urban life, particularly in metropolitan areas, have created much&lt;br /&gt;difficulty in recent urban studies. Therefore, in recent decades study of the urban condition at lower levels&lt;br /&gt;and within the framework of communities or neighborhoods was brought forward, concentrating on&lt;br /&gt;different approaches to the community development. In a number of these approaches it has been&lt;br /&gt;emphasized that social capital is the main factor and a necessary prerequisite for community development.&lt;br /&gt;In addition, the psychological aspects of life which covers peoples&#039; attitudes to their life and living&lt;br /&gt;environment, is considered as one of the main factors in evaluating the quality of life or the output of&lt;br /&gt;community development plans. The sustainable relation between man and environment is based on the&lt;br /&gt;potential interaction of human needs and potentials of the physical environment. Community or&lt;br /&gt;neighborhood development is aimed at building a human environment that responds efficiently to the&lt;br /&gt;human needs in settlements, including the basic human needs, as well as higher tier, social and&lt;br /&gt;psychological needs. These would be satisfied when a strong sense of community, as a social capital, is&lt;br /&gt;developed. In turn, social capital is a good means to promote an indigenous and sustainable development.&lt;br /&gt;Community sustainable development is a concept that was presented after the concept of sustainable&lt;br /&gt;development was unfortunate in achieving its aims, and therefore further emphasis was placed on local&lt;br /&gt;society efforts to access goals of sustainable at measurable dimensions. Asset-based approach to&lt;br /&gt;sustainable community development emphasizes the existing assets in the community. It is emphasizes on&lt;br /&gt;capacity building, mobilizing local resource and public local capital which consists of social capital and&lt;br /&gt;physical capital. Furthermore asset based approach is process oriented, comprehensive and an important&lt;br /&gt;tool to achieve local sustainable development. Planners and policymakers have recognized the role of the&lt;br /&gt;local assets, including physical capital (housing stock, roads, and the public space) and social capital (the&lt;br /&gt;informal networks of trust and reciprocity) in creating healthy communities. The critical examination of&lt;br /&gt;various urban policies helps us to differentiate between an asset-based as opposed to the conventional&lt;br /&gt;need-based approach to policymaking, and to explore the mutual impacts of government policies and the&lt;br /&gt;target groups that are affected by them; policies could result in the formation or destruction of the local&lt;br /&gt;assets (social capital). The study offers a conceptual framework, consisting of policy networks defined in&lt;br /&gt;terms of policy type and target groups. Two additional concepts are used to evaluate the mutual impacts of&lt;br /&gt;policies and target groups including interconnectedness (the strength of relationship between the&lt;br /&gt;government and the target group) and cohesion (the distribution of objectives among the actors).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">محله</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">رویکرد دارایی مبنا</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">سرمایه اجتماعی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">توسعه پایدار محله ای</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_195_9caca7fa56b53301e127a8c053058dcb.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه هنر ایران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>نامه معماری و شهرسازی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2717-1299</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Social Engineering and the Role of Community Participation to Increase Feasibility in Renewal of Dilapidated Urban Areas (The Case of Nematabad, 19th District of Tehran)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>مهندسی اجتماعی و نقش مشارکت مردمی در تحقق پذیری نوسازی در بافت های فرسوده شهری (نمونه موردی: محله نعمت آباد، منطقه 19 ، تهران)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>141</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>158</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">196</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30480/aup.2010.196</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>بهمن</FirstName>
					<LastName>ادی بزاده</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار گروه معماری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>حدیثه</FirstName>
					<LastName>عسگری تفرشی</LastName>
<Affiliation>کارشناس ارشد برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>ابراهیم</FirstName>
					<LastName>حسینی</LastName>
<Affiliation>کارشناس ارشد طراحی شهری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس تهران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Aiming at achievement of community participation and maximum feasibility for urban plans, social&lt;br /&gt;engineering approach is to be discussed, in this paper, as a method of planning in close interaction with&lt;br /&gt;people. Citizen participation in urban renewal can not be judged simply as an effort to “plan with people”&lt;br /&gt;and thus realize a democratic goal, but only with reference to the differing capacities of various social&lt;br /&gt;classes to engage in the collective determination of objectives, and the implications of such participation&lt;br /&gt;for the ends of the renewal program. Further, citizen participation has got many consequences for the&lt;br /&gt;growing number of big-city mayors who seek power without having strong party organizations.&lt;br /&gt;Communities are supposed to participate fully in the planning and implementation of urban renewal&lt;br /&gt;projects. Participation is a process through which stakeholders influence and share control over&lt;br /&gt;development initiatives, as well as the decisions and resources which affect them. Participation may be a&lt;br /&gt;means or an end, but in reality it is usually both. Community participation should be aimed at empowering&lt;br /&gt;people by ensuring that skills are developed and that employment opportunities are created. Involving&lt;br /&gt;people in order to increase awareness, empower, build capacity, or expand rights and duties may be an end&lt;br /&gt;in itself, but it may also function as an instrumental means for accomplishing a specific task. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;working with people to accomplish a specific task may enable them to expand their confidence and ability&lt;br /&gt;to address other issues in their lives. Community participation should be aimed at empowering people by&lt;br /&gt;ensuring that skills are developed and that employment opportunities are created. The emphasis, in social&lt;br /&gt;engineering, is on continuous attendance and participation of people, from the outset of basic studies to the&lt;br /&gt;final phase of project. Having: 1) theoretical principles; 2) dynamic and interactive structure; and 3)&lt;br /&gt;methods of implementation, social engineering is a theory capable of being generalized to different areas.&lt;br /&gt;Among outcomes of social engineering are:&lt;br /&gt; Rapid implementation process,&lt;br /&gt; Assurance of target group’s approval,&lt;br /&gt; Omission of parallel and redundant phases,&lt;br /&gt; Reliability on planning and decrease of opponents, and&lt;br /&gt; Constant interaction between community and municipal administration.&lt;br /&gt;The present paper is a survey on the use of social engineering to cope with the problem of dilapidated&lt;br /&gt;urban areas and describes different phases of planning with people from the beginning to the proposal of&lt;br /&gt;alternative plans in the case of Nematabad. Research methodology of this study includes in-site and library&lt;br /&gt;studies, and documentary reports of the whole process, describing different phases of the project from the&lt;br /&gt;first acquaintance with given area to the final presentation of plans to people, emphasizing on the role of&lt;br /&gt;social engineering. The paper ends up with a comparative discussion on proposed plan as a result of a&lt;br /&gt;combination of social engineering with community - participatory methods.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">مهندسی اجتماعی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">مشارکت مردمی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">تحقق پذیری</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نعمت آباد</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">تهران</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_196_7c182fefd2c4c588d5d639cf45b6dbcf.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
