<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه هنر ایران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>نامه معماری و شهرسازی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2717-1299</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Theory of Planning and the Contexts Forming Them From the Early Decades of 20 Century until the Mid 1970s</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>نظریه های برنامه ریزی و زمینه های شکل دهنده ی آن ها از اوایل قرن بیستم تا اواسط دهه١٩٧٠</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>103</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>120</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">194</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30480/aup.2010.194</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>ایرج</FirstName>
					<LastName>اسدی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، دانشگاه تهران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>احمد</FirstName>
					<LastName>سعیدنیا</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار دانشکده شهرسازی، دانشگاه تهران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Present paper aims at examination of planning theory until mid 1970s and the contexts causing them.&lt;br /&gt;Selecting 1970 decade is for this reason that the point of time is a mediate between two distinct types of&lt;br /&gt;planning theories: theories of planning until 1970 (mainly positivist), and communicative planning&lt;br /&gt;theories (post positivist) that are characteristics of recent decades. Facing the questions about why&lt;br /&gt;planning theories are forming and how they are evolving, this paper, learnt from philosophers of science,&lt;br /&gt;presuppose that all theories are created to provide an explanation for a theoretical tension resulting from a&lt;br /&gt;problematic situation. Planning theories are affected from external factors and contexts. They are not&lt;br /&gt;context-less (the condition dominant in natural science ), but they are made by individuals within the&lt;br /&gt;social, economic and political systems of a real world. Planning theorists try to explain, justify and&lt;br /&gt;interpret planning in their own social context. In other words, theory and theorizer are constrained by&lt;br /&gt;planning practice and complex social, economic, political and epistemological system within which they&lt;br /&gt;operate. Changes in planning reality and their contexts probably will be reflected in theorizers’ perceptions&lt;br /&gt;of their profession and nature of theory, social processes and changes. So, for understanding planning&lt;br /&gt;theories and their evolutions, we must know that the economic, social, political and epistemological forces&lt;br /&gt;produce them. This paper tries to provide a brief description of planning theories and different factors&lt;br /&gt;forming them with focusing on three distinct periods. After defining some basic concepts, the paper&lt;br /&gt;presents a typology of theories within urban and regional planning. Then, the paper bases its examination&lt;br /&gt;on a specific type of theories discussed, namely planning theory or theory of planning. In later stage,&lt;br /&gt;different period of planning theorizing is presented according to the views of main planning scholars: there&lt;br /&gt;are three main period of planning theory until mid 1970s, as follows: a) first period from beginning of&lt;br /&gt;twenty century to the end of 1950s which is well known as a master planning or blueprint period. In this&lt;br /&gt;period there is not a planning theory. Second period starts from the end of 1950 to the end1960. This&lt;br /&gt;period can be named the era of dominance of systematic planning or procedural planning theory. The third&lt;br /&gt;period starts from early 1970s. In this period, there is not any dominant planning theory but there are&lt;br /&gt;several planning theories such as incremental planning, advocacy planning, mixed scanning, political&lt;br /&gt;economy and transactive planning. Within each planning theorizing periods, different planning theories&lt;br /&gt;and factors significant on forming them are discussed. Before doing conclusion, a brief analytical report of&lt;br /&gt;evolution of planning theory in recent decades are presented. Examination indicates that planning field in&lt;br /&gt;recent decades is dominated by communicative planning theories and post-positive theories from 1980 on.&lt;br /&gt;Examination of this period, also, demonstrates that external conditions such as transformation of social&lt;br /&gt;theories and epistemological changes originated from knowledge field outside of planning are significant&lt;br /&gt;in creation of post positive theories of planning. Theory of communicative action as a social theory from&lt;br /&gt;Habermas is the most important framework theory for planning theorists. In final section, paper concludes&lt;br /&gt;on different contextual forces which are vital in creation of planning theories.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نظریه برنامه ریزی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نظریه در برنامه ریزی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نظریه برنامه ریزی رویه ای</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">دوره تکثرگرایی نظری</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_194_b207d32e9cf22a4380bddc7db3ad3764.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
