دانشگاه هنر ایران نامه معماری و شهرسازی 2717-1299 2 4 2010 09 22 Analysis of the Building of Mosalla (Public Prayer Place) in Rasht City تحلیلی بر بنای مصلّای شهر رشت 25 42 190 10.30480/aup.2010.190 FA مژگان خاکپور دانشجوی دکترای پژوهش هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس حسنعلی پورمند استادیار گروه پژوهش هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس Journal Article 2010 07 04 Criticism of the architectural works, which are not very old, is one of the constructive forward looking<br />critics that may be effective in positive changes of design methods. Determination of the positive aspects<br />of an architectural work and the statement of the project proper specifications are the methods requiring<br />architectural work criticism. Some of the most important duties of the common critics in this domain are<br />the extension of better perception and understanding of the space, discrimination of the good and bad, and<br />the judgment in relation to the architectural work and also the promotion of the project following to<br />supporting, amendment, and the optimization of the designing approaches in creation of a more desirable<br />space. In this article, which has been performed on the basis of descriptive- analytic research and with<br />library study method and field investigations, at first, we reviewed the aims of criticism of the<br />architectural works and then interpretive (hermeneutic) criticism, i.e. the criticism method used in<br />critization of the building of Mosalla (Public Prayer Place) in Rasht City, was mentioned briefly. The main<br />part of the article is related to the statement of the specifications of the building of Mosalla (Public Prayer<br />Place) in Rasht City that has challenged the building with a view to interpretive (hermeneutic) criticism.<br />At the end part of the article, the positive and negative aspects of the work were mentioned with the aim of<br />using the criticism advantages in strengthening of proper methods of design in the future. Also some<br />aspects of designing of the building of Mosalla (Public Prayers Place), which had lasting effects on<br />individuals' mind, have been distinguished from those aspects, which decrease the space desirability. At<br />all, the whole all points of design review obtained from criticism do not have equal value in people's mind<br />and all people do not have the same view against the building. On the strength of looking forward for<br />durability and public acceptance of a building, if it is tried to decrease the negative aspects, attractiveness<br />of the architectural work increases and therefore, the quality of the designed spaces will be improved. But<br />with a focus on the large number of the positive or negative aspects of an architectural work, the building<br />is considered as qualified or unqualified for attractiveness in people's minds. In relation to the building of<br />Mosalla, the positive aspects were more than the negative ones that caused acceptance and attractiveness<br />of this architectural work in one of the main areas’ of the city.<br /><br /> https://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_190_41f925c7a83ecbddabb34ffbf05beb44.pdf